Heavyweight Tourney: Rd 3: Gene Tunney .Vs. Rocky Marciano

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by la-califa, Nov 18, 2009.


  1. pugilist_boyd

    pugilist_boyd BUSTED UP PUG Full Member

    830
    3
    Jun 19, 2007
    dempsey in his prime would ko tunney but rocky was not as overly aggr. as jack 12 or 10 rnds maybe dec. for tunney but 15 rnds rocky tho bloody caches gene for a ko
     
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,628
    46,262
    Feb 11, 2005
    I think most here are selling Tunney way short. He excelled at pace, distance and timing. He was athletic, light on his feet and quick as hell. He was absolutely masterful in the exact way that befuddled Marciano. And to boot, when his hands were healthy, he had tremendous kick in his punches. I really see him having no problem beating Marciano over 15 rounds and making him look like mincemeat by the end.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,998
    48,087
    Mar 21, 2007
    Note that many people are picking Marciano to stop Tunney, something else that has never happened.

    Leaving aside any chance Tunney has of winning by KO, do you see him changing his plan when behind on the cards?

    I'd point you towards the last couple of rounds of LaMotta-Robinson VI, Foster-Tiger and Margarito v Cotto for a more recent example. In all of these cases the taller man was the puncher, though.

    All this is true, but I think the point of my original post has rather been missed. I'm not picking Tunney by knockout. I said that I didn't imagine Tunney ceeding the ring to Marciano if his opening strategy was losing him the fight, which I imagine it would. My point is that Tunney would rally and try something different. It was more an observation on the contradictory conclusion some style clashes can bring; Tunney, a master-boxer probably can't win this one on the cards. He would need a KO to win. Being the type of fighter/man he was he would probably seek it against the odds late in the fight when the chips are down. And in spite installing Marciano as a favourite, I don't entirely rule out the possibility of Tunney's winning on a stoppage of some sort.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,998
    48,087
    Mar 21, 2007
    Ringsmiths KO durable opponents often. It isn't Frazier or Lyle who holds the KO victory over Oscar Bonavena but Ali. It's not Dempsey who holds the KO victory over Gibbons, but Tunney.

    To define puncher's chance; when a fighter's ability to win a fight lies only in a knockout.
     
  5. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,112
    10,526
    Jul 28, 2009
    Gene, points. Too good. Too mobile. Too durable. Marciano was a beast but I don't think Gene would fight Marciano's fight and I don't think Marciano could force him to either.
     
  6. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Is Gene winning this poll then?
     
  7. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    It is a close fight, i have Tunney ahead on points but it seems as if we are approaching the final stages. Rocky is going to need a KO to win this. Could Suzy Q pull it out of the fire for Marciano?
     
  8. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Suzie needs to produce a moment of magic.

    Surely Tunney won't go the same way as Walcott...... I'm always hopeful.
     
  9. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    Who knows, maybe Tunney will see an opening, and crack Rocky on the Jaw for a KO!
     
  10. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    I've just realised your post count is 777 right now. Isn't that supposed to be lucky or something?

    Go Rock!!
     
  11. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    I knew you'd say that. :D

    It is a valid point, but i think the situation is asymmetric because:
    1) Rocky faced an excellent amount of hitters and took their best shot
    2) Tunney faced only one puncher (at HW), and although he performed extremely well, he nearly got knocked out
    3) Tunney mostly AVOIDED the hard punches. Marciano, because of his come-forward style and the fact that he faced heavyweights throughout his entire career, has taken many hard shots. Of course it is to Tunneys credit that he didn't let those shots land on him, but i think we can agree Marciano is going to connect sooner or later. When he does, what happens? It's an unknown factor - against Dempsey, it didn't go well - while the reverse is not unkown. We've seen Marciano in wars and he always came out on top.


    I would love to see it because this is what i like most about boxing: adaptation. However, i'm not sure if Tunney CAN, really. Perhaps the sort of changes that Calzaghe made in rounds 3-4 to beat Kessler. But needless to say, those are completely different kind of fighters.

    I think Marciano is the ultimate nightmare for boxer/movers, and i'm not sure whether adapting really is an option. If a boxer beats a swarmer, they need to have success during both the early and middle rounds. That might sound trivial, but think about it - how often has a boxing type of fighter lost the early and middle rounds, but came back to win? Usually, when a swarmer breaks you down, then that's it. It's over. When Frazier had Ali on the ropes and wouldn't let him go, there was nothing Ali could do to avoid defeat. He fought gallantly and has nothing to be ashamed off, but he lost.


    In addition to the taller man being the puncher, the fighters in question were broken down already. Cotto had the life beaten out of him. LaMotta had nothing left.

    I applaud you for finding examples, but i find the probability of Tunney breaking Marciano down while losing rounds, making a late-fight comeback possible, extremely low. Especially considering Rocky is the puncher here, and is proven to the highest degree in both stamina and durability.


    Okay. I Tunney only finds a KO if he somehow outclasses Marciano and lands on him with ease. And even then, i expect him to need 12+ rounds to finally put his opponent out of his misery. After all, Dempsey, who was outclassed, twice went 10 rounds and suffered only one flash knockdown.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,998
    48,087
    Mar 21, 2007
    Here, I disagree with you, I thought it went incredibly well. Dempsey catches Tunney a beauty, then multiple hard punches as Tunney is on his way down, defenceless and unable even to ride them. They are fast, hard punches delivered in quick succession. That Tunney rose is an underated achievment, I feel. That he was able to rise and box so beautifully for the remainder of the round against maybe the best pre-Louis HW finisher is nothing short of astounding.




    Well it isn't rocket science, I think - i'm not talking about a subtle adaption here. I'm talking about a boxer turning puncher, instead of excusing himself from the pocket Gene would look to make exchanges up close off nimble footwork and crisp punching. A strategy more likely to get him KO'd than anything else, but the right thing to do if he is losing a fight on points.

    It's precisely because he is such a nightmare for pure boxers that an adatpion would be neccessary...i'm suggesting nothing less than Tunney would stop boxing on the backfoot and try to knock Mariano out...so the limitations of his type (As far as Rocky is concerned) cease to hamper him, and a different, more acute set of problems present themselves...can Tunney solve them? Unlikely but I think it's his best chance of winning for the reasons you've touched upon.

    It's a trite comparison, but think Walcott's first round tactics but late in the fight.

    No, you are right, but i'm not talking here about a gradual breakdown rather a sudden switch.




    True, but Dempsey probably wasn't going to get home in a fifteen round fight the first time...at the very least it would have been an astonishing feat of endurance.
     
  13. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004
    I remember the long count, the stiff and inactive legs of Dempsey but the flurry that put Gene down. I have to say Gene got up and ran like a thief to clear his cobwebs but Jack was rusty and did not have the one punch Marciano had. Also Gene did not have the pinpoint power of Walcott or Moore. I see Marciano getting stronger as the fight goes on and if he happens to land on of his bombs it would take its toll on Gene rounds 10-15 would be tough territory for Tunney sharing the same Square space as Rocky
     
  14. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004

    And who in your opinion did Tunney fight who was better than Marciano
     
  15. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Tunney like Marciano had never ending stamina. In fact I think Tunney stamina might even be better than the Rock's, as he could box and move for the full 15. Unlike Charles and Walcott, Tunney fought smart, and had a better chin. Tunney might also be one of the hardest punchers Marciano ever faced.

    I'll go with Tunney via clear UD. The fight might look a bit like LaStarza vs Marciano 2, except Tunney was far better than Lastarza who had an early lead, and isn't likely to wilt in the later rounds.