Heavyweight Tourney: Rd 3: Pt. 2: Results

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by la-califa, Dec 5, 2009.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,067
    Mar 21, 2007
    Chris, what does any of that have to do with Gary Kasparov?
     
  2. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Didn't he beat Short in the early 90's, when he was in his prime? A Brit, right?

    More impressive perhaps is that he defended the title against Anand who now is champ for a few years. Some Lewis-Klitschko / Louis - Walcott stuff right there, beating the future champ while having seen better days yourself.


    Thing is, some people play brilliant, entertaining chess (Fischer), but as a result leave themselves open. Others aren't as brilliant, but play so extremely solid and on safe that they're utterly boring to watch but incredibly hard to beat (Lasker). Kasparov is somewhere in between.
     
  3. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    ;) Off to bed now. Hate being a working class slave.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,067
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yes, that's him, but Kasparov was already dropping of by then. His weird Linares tournament wasn't far away, but it's his own commentary on his paly is the real kicker. Never heard him so hard on himself. In his own words his play was rife with "serious, serious mistakes".

    Short did well in the second half of that match playing for dirty pawn structures and activity - totally counter-intuitive but it worked. In the first half of the fight Short tried to play clean and got utterly destroyed. I think Kasparov was losing his edge in terms of calculations.

    Considering what Karpov era Kasparove would have done with Short is frightening. It certainly would have been a white-wash it nearly was anyway.

    You're right about Kasparov-Anand though. Kasparov had recognised his short-comings by this point IMO. The short match was him at his most vulnerable until he fell of and he still utterly destroyed the world's #2 matchplayer. Horrible genius *******. One of the most dominant protagonists of any sport ever.

    Tragic.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,731
    29,080
    Jun 2, 2006
    Sullivan may have looked like an old man ,but he was actually 52 when that footage was filmed,8 years later he was dead.
     
  6. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007

    So if Wlad won the vote 25-5 in the classic section, why did Sullivan advance?
     
  7. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    Janitor and my votes are woth 5 points each.

    And Wlad loses 30 points because Frankenfrank picked him.
     
  8. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Obviously I agree with the majority. I happen to think Marciano beats Tunney even more convincingly, but glad he won. I watched the first Charles fight and he is actually better than I thought from the last few times I watched it. In fact, Charles from the first and second Rocky fights are two different animals. Charles was a hungry and willful and very game fighter that had a lot more than 75% of it left like I had thought. His mobility, I also underrated. His combinations, were very fluid, quick, and sharp. The difference from the first and second fights is the quickness, freshness, speed in hand and foot and the motivation and stamina. Charles had more than enough to beat many fighters from the first fight.

    On the other hand, I re-watched the Tunney fights with Dempsey. His footwork is overrated. He has no rhythm and just dances around - honestly I believe I can move better and more fluid than him. He doesn't have quite the rhythm and ability to shoot off and move like Ali. It's not the stick and move and distribute weight as effectively like an Ali. On the other hand, his offense is underrated. He shoots quick dashing combos that are very effective and strong. Strangely, Tunney doesn't reminds me of Manny Pacquaio more than Ali. He dances, but dashes in and out offensively in the Dempsey fight. It's hand speed and offense is great to watch. His dancing is just complete defense for the time
     
  9. KOTF

    KOTF Bingooo Full Member

    13,448
    26
    Jun 2, 2009
    I thought the results were run off a computer simulation?
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,236
    Feb 15, 2006
    You still don't get it.

    Sullivan was not particularly small, he sure as hell wasn't untested, and he didn't even fight under a particularly different ruleset when all is said and done.

    At least Wlad gets $1000 for lasting four rounds against Sullivan.
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,236
    Feb 15, 2006
    This is not actualy true.

    Many people rated Sullivan as the greatest ever into the reign of Jack Johnson and beyond.

    He only started to slip when the people who had seen him started dieing off.
     
  12. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,582
    46,195
    Feb 11, 2005
    No, that's some pretty large padding he's got there, almost a front-butt, too!

    This content is protected


    Yeah, he fought terrors who looked like this...
    This content is protected


    Ahh, that 19th century physiognomay... Oh, I know, they had that one-inch phantom crucial punch to the solar plexus that would kill you three weeks later.
     
  13. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    It was raining in one of the Tunney Demspey fights. Tunney had quick feet, and could move. To say he's over rated in this department is way off unless someone says he is on par with a prime Ali.
     
  14. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Ok then. Frankenfrank strikes again. Case closed!
     
  15. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    No, he's no where near a prime Ali with footwork. He has great footspeed, but no rhythm and doesn't have a great ability to stick and move and distribute weight in the motion of his dancing, and that's because he has no rhythm. He bounces in and out from attacks, and it's his awesome offensive that's better than his legs/footwork. Ali's footwork coupled with his best was always his best arsenal, but his legs were more valuable.'

    Err, I read what you wrote again. Got mixed up. I think his footwork is touted on about too much. I prefer his slashing offensive, personally.