How do you guys see this fight? Unless one guy knocks other out cold there, we have 2 options. If it is in Britain the most possible finish is some bullsh|t stoppage. In Finnland/Germany- a controversial decision. So my question is: if they fought somewhere neutral, without any promoters, in a perfect place for boxingD) who'd win? I don't believe in boxing math where: if Chisora>Helenius and Fury>Chisora then Helenius>Fury... Chisora fought great fight yesterday. If he contiues to fight this way and improve he will be champ one day. On the other hand against Fury he looked just awful. I see Helenius winning by midrounds stoppage. Both guys are big, but I think Helenius hits stronger, has more experience as pro and amateur. Also this guy can take a shot, we have seen that yesterday. Fury is far more exciting to watch but that doesn't win you fights your opinions?
Fury is a far better boxer (and I am by no means a Fury fan) Helenius really showed how limited he was yesterday
Helenius. People once again jumping to conclusion because of one weaker performance (with a broken hand and against a very good opponent). Fury looked much worse in the first McDermott fight. Fury is good but Helenius is better, would love to see this at some point.
The Chisora we saw yesterday and the Chisora who lost to Fury are two totally different boxers. Fury would have no chance in a rematch, and even the one handed Helenius we saw yesterday would beat him. If Helenius can fix his glass hands, he'll knock Fury out, if not, he'll win a (neutral) decision.
It's the same hand that has been ****ed many times before, it is broken. Ofcourse you can question if it really happened as early as round 1, if you want to go that route.
helenius is one **** boxer..he cant really do anything..however fury eats right hands like he eats smarties so hes getting knocked out
excusesssssssssssssssssssssssss..man up he got outboxed by a mediocre boxer...he was being outboxed by sergai aswell only difference was the white wolf hadnt boxed in so long and gassed out...helenius is very very limited
depends where they fight. in finland and germany helenius will always win, outside those countries he will lose
Ive chosen the bottom option, a bit of a kop out. Im not saying it would be a really close fight, i think one would sort of dominate the other, or find it quite a bit easier but im not sure which way round id call it. I dont really rate either of them, its a **** poor division and these 2 are far from world class, it would be an ugly ass fight thats for sure, entertaining though. If i had to id say Fury is just too ****in easy to hit and Hellno its too hard for it not to count.
Styles makes fights. Helenius would be a very difficult fighter for Fury. Fury can dance little bit and pop some nice jab witch made him win against fat Chisora when Helenius had lot of troubles with well contioned Chisora.. But if Pajcik floored Fury I guess there would be a BIG chance that Helenius would do that too.. And Helenius broke his hand in first round when he hurt Chisora with his straight.. Helenius KO5 Fury, better chin and better puncher
then,by your dumb ass logic helenius is better than wlad cause he beat brewster and wlad lost to him.so fury > chisora > helenius > wlad klitschko. good thinking,thanks,you are a connoisseur of this sport.