Helenius : "With an healthy right hand, Chisora wouldn't have lasted six rounds"

1. No, he didn't het Chisora "a lot". Hardly at all to be frank. Chisora ****ing trippled Helenius's power punch number. That's insane.
2. I don't remember saying that Chisora hurt him. Why did you bring that up?

 

DEAL WITH IT

This content is protected

 

Okay sorry then. The fight was definitely a 116-115.

I warn you to not have a look at the CompuBox stats though. Might turn out bad for your health.

 

Im guessing your going by "compubox" numbers? Which, by the way, we didn't even get to see live. . They were tallied up by people watching the replay. . .

Helenius hurt Chisora twice. . . Chisora hit gloves, arms, and elbows 90% of the fight.

 

DEAL WITH IT

This content is protected

 

Good assessment Khan. It was homecooking, but then again, it takes more than rough housing the champ in his backyard to get a nod. And have a look at Harris v Gerber. No one puts that one out there too often. I had that one like 7-1 Harris, but the judges had it bassackwards.

And when I watched the helenius chisora fight I had Helenius winning the first time. Drew it a few times, and gave it to Chisora by a similar score last time.

One armed or not, Helenius did enough to win in his backyard.:think

 

All right, you're just trolling at this point. You're acting like this was a Adamek/Chambers situation where Adamek threw flurries into thin air and gloves all night while Chambers sticked to accurate punching.
Chisora was more active and more accurate and outlanded him by a ****ing landslide. Show me 4 rounds Helenius won. I have a hard time coming up with three.

 

There was like 3-4 rounds that were clear Chisora rounds .. . 2-3 rounds that were clear Helenius rounds, and 5, or 6 rounds that were pretty ****ing close.

 

Uhh, no I'm not, I never once drew that analogy. . I never said Helenius was consistently landing head snapping clean shots either. . . But CHisora definitely wasn't himself. . .

They BOTH were mostly hitting gloves, arms, and elbows. . . With Helenius landing a few more clean shots.

 

Man, this is not even an opinion, it's just plain wrong. There are four scoring criteria, namely:

1. Clean punching
2. Effective Aggressiveness
3. Ring Generalship
4. Defense

What exactly was Helenius better at? Simple answer: Nothing. Not even close to winning a single criterion.

 

You're on a wind up. Chisora had a ****ing connect% of 41%. FORTY ONE! 46% in power punches even FFS. Nothing you say makes sense. What are you doing? Why are you defensive about such a disgraceful robbery?

 

They were all pretty ****ing close in all of those criteria. . . The rounds that were close, at least 5 of the rounds, it was between Chisora's effective aggression, and helenius clean punching. . . most of his aggression was not effective. . . at all. . .


I called it like I saw it. . It could have been as much as 116-112 Chisora, but I scored 3 of the rounds 10-10 because they were so ****ing close. . .


I'm not arguing with you that Chisora shouldn't have won. . I scored the fight for him! BUT HELENIUS WON THE DAMN FIGH. . And it WAS NOT some "ROBBERY" like you are making out. . . It was a hometown decision. . . HELENIUS WON. . DEAL WITH IT

 

Says who? Compubox atsch

 

I'm not.. I'm just telling you Helenius won, and to deal with it baby :happy