Help me understand: Thrilla in Manilla > Ali/Frazier I

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by 2fast2see, Nov 24, 2010.


  1. 2fast2see

    2fast2see New Member Full Member

    52
    0
    Aug 26, 2010
    The Thrilla in Manilla is regarded as the most memorable fight(greatest fight?) between Ali and Frazier. I don't get it and never will, but I do have an opinion: Ali did not beat Frazier in the most socially, politically and culturally significant fight in the history of boxing, i.e... the greatest fight of all time. The story line was already written-Ali standing up for his faith declined to serve in Vietnam, therefore, he was wrongly stripped of his title. He was the guy all of the anti-war, anti-establishment and media were rooting for. A victory by Ali was a vindication for their cause. The major problem in the vindication was that Frazier won, i.e. the wrong guy won. For this Frazier had to be de-humanized. Hence, since the last fight was better than expected and Ali won, somehow this fight became the fight that validates Ali in his rivalry with Frazier.

    I remember in 1989 talking with a co-worker and he was shocked to know that Ali had EVER lost to Frazier.

    That's the impact of the Thrilla in Manilla: Erase the memory of Ali/Frazier I
     
  2. KiwiCC

    KiwiCC Grasshopper Full Member

    110
    0
    Oct 13, 2010
    Interesting point. Ali-Frazier I was, as you say, more about boxing and, for a lot of people, as you say, the 'wrong' guy won. I'm not sure that the Thrilla in Manilla was on the general public's radar in terms of politics and social attitudes 4 years later in 1975 - the Vietnam War had been fought, lost & ended, Nixon had been impeached & Ali had performed a miracle in beating George Foreman. I don't think this fight had the same hype until after it had happened - ie, until it became apparent what a classic fight it was. Ali-Frazier I was about more than boxing at the time, Ali-Frazier III was about blood, guts, courage and indomitable wills - in other words - the best of boxing. Good post.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,990
    48,068
    Mar 21, 2007
    Well it was the decider in a series of 3. In that sense it was the fight that vindicated Ali in his rivalry with Joe.
     
  4. . i am the biggest fan of ali but in my opinion frazier did deserve the victory in manilla, ali did not want to continue, joe wanted to continue, but eddie futch did stop the fight the first. moments before ali told dundee "i can not continue" ali was absolutely tired.
     
  5. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    I prefer the fotc over the thrilla. Much better fight, the thrilla was more gruesome and it always hurts me seeing Frazier´s corner ending the fight.
     
  6. jaffay

    jaffay New Orleans Hornets Full Member

    3,980
    18
    Jun 24, 2007
    Well, watch Thrilla in Manilla. You will never see more spirited, tough, gritty and dramatic fight at HW.
     
  7. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,431
    9,419
    Jul 15, 2008
    Very interesting post ... revisionism by the left to a degree ...

    Thrilla was a brutal fight between two fighters past their primes. The difference was that Ali had more left in the tank than Frazier going into the bout but Joe's heart and hatred of Ali fueled his performance. When you consider that Frazier was blind in one eye since the mid 1960's you realize just how amazing a fighter he was ...
     
  8. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,133
    8,588
    Jul 17, 2009
    A lot gets made of this point. And not without merit. Thing is,I firmly believe that Ali said that stuff in the heat of the moment,like a kid wishing that it was Christmas time in mid-Summer ! If Dundee had started to cut the gloves off,Muhammad would have stopped him. As exhausted as he was,the fourteenth was Muhammad's most dominant round since the early ones,and he could n't miss Joe with his punches. There would have been no way in Heaven,Earth or Hell that Ali would have quit.
     
  9. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,133
    8,588
    Jul 17, 2009
    As is said,the FOTC was bigger than boxing,owing to the way things were. The Thrilla was a FIGHT,pure and simple. Both had their merits. The first one was better from a technical standpoint,while the third was the finale. It is often forgotten how good fight number 2 was,actually. Only because it was sandwiched between two epics.
     
  10. Ezzard

    Ezzard Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,070
    19
    Nov 11, 2005
    FOTC is the most significant but all 3 count.
     
  11. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,133
    8,588
    Jul 17, 2009
    Exactly. Like all the best epics,it had a beginning,a middle and an end.
     
  12. DDDUUDDDEE

    DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

    17,608
    23
    Oct 25, 2010
    Because in Manilla they literally kicked the ever loving **** out of each other.

    And I guess I'm a sadist and find that more exciting than the boxing display they both put on in FOTC.
     
  13. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    57
    Dec 26, 2009
    Me too, FOTC was between two younger, faster fighters & showcased much more impressive skills.
     
  14. amhlilhaus

    amhlilhaus Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,840
    12
    Mar 24, 2005
    ali won, case closed.

    just like you're not allowed to point out what an ******* he was because of how he's remembered and is today.
     
  15. KiwiCC

    KiwiCC Grasshopper Full Member

    110
    0
    Oct 13, 2010
    I haven't seen FOTC since it was shown live in 1971, nor have I ever seen Ali-Frazier II- anyone know where, or even if, I can get a copy?