Henry Armstrong vs Floyd Mayweather Jnr

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Journeyman92, Aug 3, 2022.

Who wins?

  1. Armstrong

    86.7%
  2. Mayweather

    13.3%
  3. Draw

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist Full Member

    18,238
    9,878
    Apr 3, 2012
    Seven wins is better than seven loses, chief.
     
  2. Ioakeim Tzortzakis

    Ioakeim Tzortzakis Member Full Member

    103
    213
    Aug 27, 2020
    Is that all you have to say at this point ? Hilairious

    14 >7 in HoF
    65 > 27 in top 10 rated opponents
    39 > 27 in top 3 opponents
    19 consecutive defenses in a single weight division in 2 years> 19 defenses spread in different weight classes with multiple breaks across

    Those are the stats. Floyd would have packed several more losses than he did if he fought in Armstrong's place. Henry may have lost more, but he won way more to compensate when he actually hit his prime. It's a completely one sided comparison
     
  3. escudo

    escudo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,291
    4,553
    May 13, 2014
    Barely. Against a guy with1/2 the talent of Armstrong
     
    George Crowcroft and Kid Bacon like this.
  4. Kid Bacon

    Kid Bacon All-Time-Fat Full Member

    721
    316
    Nov 8, 2011
    Tough call, but I put my money on Armstrong

    Fairweather lacks the punching power to stop Armstrong who is a tough nut to crack.
    Also I highly doubt Fairweather will be able to outbox and outrun him for 10+ rounds; thus the unavoidable wear and tear will gradually affect Fairweather's stamina and mobility.

    Soon or later he won’t be able to dodge Armstrong's relentless swarming and will start taking heavy damage.

    Anyway, as much as I dislike Fairweather I don't think Armstrong manages to stop him. Fairweather's amazing defensive skills should allow him to still end the fight on his feet.

    Armstrong UD.
     
  5. Rubber Glove Sandwich

    Rubber Glove Sandwich Tire Iron Jones was good but he was no Full Member

    577
    940
    Aug 15, 2020
    To give the boring fence sitting answer I think this is a way tougher fight for both guys than their fans believe.
     
    Marvelous Mauler likes this.
  6. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,386
    8,676
    May 30, 2019
    14 wins is better than 7 wins
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  7. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,386
    8,676
    May 30, 2019
    Or maybe you are slow and dumb, cause you don't realize that Armstrong cut off the ring better than anyone in history, making then look that way.

    Keep in mind that Armstrong fought in the same era as SRR, your beloved GOAT.
     
  8. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,386
    8,676
    May 30, 2019
    What size advantage? Floyd wasn't bigger than Armstrong.

    Armstrong has 180 fights in only 13 years compared to Floyd's 50. He fought more ranked opponents than Floyd has fights in his career. Are you talking about intelectual dishonesty? You even admited here that you don't read replies to your posts.

    You can't be taken seriously in any discussion here.
     
  9. White Bomber

    White Bomber Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,245
    1,966
    Mar 31, 2021
    Castillo was bigger than Floyd.
    And IMO Floyd is way way more skilled than Hank.
     
  10. White Bomber

    White Bomber Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,245
    1,966
    Mar 31, 2021
    Armstrong fought before SRR. A young SRR met an old Armstrong, and SRR took pity on him and carried him.
    Also, SRR was far better overall than Armstrong.
    You can look at old timers with rose tinted glasses all you want, it ain't gonna make them any better. Modern athletes are just better, it is what it is. This doesn't diminish the greatness of the old timers, but it also doesn't give them a chance against a modern ATG.
    Jesse Owens won the gold medal in the 1936 Olympics, he wouldn't even be top 30 in the world nowadays. Same goes for boxers.
     
  11. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,386
    8,676
    May 30, 2019
    They fought in the same era, it's ridiculous to call SRR from completely different one when he's only 9 years younger. Once again you show how illogical and biased your posts are.
    That's not true, you just want to see it that way because you love SRR.
    So SRR wouldn't be top 30 boxer at WW today? Good to know.
     
  12. BEATDOWNZ

    BEATDOWNZ Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,673
    665
    Nov 30, 2014
    Picking modern fighters again... who knew!?
     
    ChrisJS likes this.
  13. META5

    META5 Active Member Full Member

    848
    732
    Jun 28, 2005
    That's patently false.

    Jesse Owens raced on a horrible track with starts that he dug himself and no modern spikes - other than improvements in nutrition and better sprinting mechanics, the biggest improvements in sprinting have come from improvements in spikes and the track itself - not because athletes are so much greater than a few generations before - genuine evolution doesn't work that fast.

    Owens' running stride and leg speed has been biomechanically analysed and the findings were that with modern spikes and on a modern track, he would be within a stride or two of Usain - clearly world class level and arguably still placing amongst the medals at the highest level.

    There's plenty of old timers that would smash modern ATGs - they may be better nutritioned but there's a range of experience, skills and ringcraft that today's fighter outside of the outliers will never achieve.

    If you're going to insist that x is supremely more skilled than y, the onus on you is to demonstrate what skills you mean, compare the level of skillset demonstrated with the relevance of the greatness/skills of the level of competition that they demonstrated it against. A fighter like Benny Leonard, Ross, Canzoneri, Williams, Pep, SRR, Louis, Charles, Moore demonstrates as much and many more skills than the vast majority of today's so called top fighters.

    There's a reason why greats such as Hop and Toney are called old school when praise is given.
     
    Last edited: Aug 4, 2022
  14. Marvelous Mauler

    Marvelous Mauler New Member Full Member

    26
    56
    Aug 24, 2021
    You don’t take into account that Armstrong remains the gold standard of infighting (along with Duran). Modern rules significantly restrict the usage of the head, shoulders, and forearms, and the way Armstrong used to control his opponents wouldn’t be allowed in today’s boxing environment. Therefore, the art of infighting couldn’t have evolved that much compared to the other aspects of boxing. All things considered, Armstrong is actually quite modern. As of yet, no one has surpassed Armstrong or Duran at infighting, and it will remain so.
     
  15. Hannibal Barca

    Hannibal Barca Active Member Full Member

    797
    498
    Jul 23, 2010
    This content is protected