Henry Armstrong vs Floyd Mayweather

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by HeavyweightCP, May 10, 2012.


  1. Hattons Hook

    Hattons Hook Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,783
    10
    Nov 15, 2009
    I agree on Hopkins, solid fighter with a special record but there are many MW's who would have won wide against him. Jermaine Taylor anybody ?
    As far as bygone era's go, why wouldnt past generations have been better ? They fought more often and there were far more quality fighters to come up against. Its not like football where the boots are better, pitches are better quality, balls are lighter. The basic rules of boxing are the same as they've always been apart from maybe there isnt as much hunger now, they dont have to fight all the time just to pay the bills.
     
  2. MoJoGoodie

    MoJoGoodie Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,905
    118
    Nov 29, 2011

    kill your self
     
  3. brnxhands

    brnxhands Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,905
    11
    Sep 1, 2011
    I get so tired of the people saying boxing has advanced so much. its regressed. Back then the talent was up to the ****in rafters.
     
  4. steve w

    steve w Active Member Full Member

    815
    12
    Jun 5, 2011
    Just the intelligent response I expected from a moron like you, obviously you please easy if you see merit in the , excuse me for not laughing the , "Executioner's' work, maybe the "Pacifist" suits him more these days.
     
  5. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    11,933
    10
    Jun 21, 2011
    Sport has evolved. Fighters from the 40s couldn't compete with modern day fighters.

    But in terms of ATGness

    Armstrong>>>Mayweather
     
  6. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    Robinson wouldn't only compete, he'd dominate. :bart
     
  7. Hattons Hook

    Hattons Hook Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,783
    10
    Nov 15, 2009


    I dunno mate, i was watching old vids of Dick Tiger last week ajnd it was obvious to me he'd destroy the current batch of MW'S with relative ease. I reckon he would have done a number on Hopkins.
     
  8. steve w

    steve w Active Member Full Member

    815
    12
    Jun 5, 2011
    Agree "Hook", if you were great then you would be greater today, especially in lighter divisions, invariably, walking around weight was their fighting weight as they fought more frequently, mostly monthly and sometimes sooner, they did not need six or twelve months to prepare for a fight.
     
  9. brnxhands

    brnxhands Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,905
    11
    Sep 1, 2011
    Your blind
     
  10. brnxhands

    brnxhands Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,905
    11
    Sep 1, 2011
    Yup. The talent has dropped tenfold. People don't know how to watch old footage.
     
  11. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,274
    6,589
    Jan 22, 2009
    :goodI was thinking the EXACT same thing:good.
     
  12. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,274
    6,589
    Jan 22, 2009
    :goodAgreed.Well put as always my friend:good
     
  13. Young Terror

    Young Terror ★ Griselda ★ Full Member

    7,930
    8,054
    May 9, 2012
    You're one dumb mu****a.
     
  14. nastynas

    nastynas Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,935
    10
    Oct 27, 2009
    exactly
     
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,242
    Sep 15, 2009
    Floyd will struggle to land clean against armstrong. This will spell trouble for a man who relies on his ability to outpunch his opponent.

    Armstrong will be able to force floyd back and will outpunch and outland him.

    Wide points win for hank.