Armstrong was great on the inside but Duran was better, he also beat Leonard toe to toe at welter, Armstong never beat a fighte than could punch like Ray or with that kind of hand speed.
Henry Armstrong would win this. Better inside fighter. Better work rate. It would be a great fight because Duran was great too. Armstrong was the best there was.
I think that a lot would depend upon Duran's strategy. Armstrong would want to make it on the inside, the question is whether Duran would oblige him, or try something different.
Though I don't see Duran stopping Armstrong, I do see him winning this fight convincingly, after a few rough rd's the 1st half of the fight. Armstrong maybe the greatest in fighter in history. But Duran's overall ability would be the difference as the fight ware's on.
This kind of fight is impossible to predict. It's 50-50 fight and anyone trying to convince that it's not close has clear bias behind him. I like Armstrong more, but I can't pick him convincingly here.
No fighter ever crowded and manipulated their opponents on the inside as well as Armstrong did. No fighter ever chopped away at their opponents as persistently and as brutally, body and head, on the inside, as did Armstrong. I've never seen any fighter throw and land the punches Armstrong threw from such short range as consistently as Armstrong did, over and over again. He was the best inside fighter, and the best pure fighter bar none, and one of the most skilled too. Duran was a little tiger but Armstrong was almost supernatural.
Watch the fights. In what way is Armstrong not the best infighter ever ?? He consistently crowded and cajoled and pressed to fight on the inside, that was always where he headed, right on top of them, and his success is undeniable. This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
You've linked me a bunch of video's I've already seen. You didn't actually explain why he's better, you just sorta said he was again.