Here's a Quote from Diaz in the past, calling Manny!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PacDbest, Mar 10, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 2 of 15
  1. PacDbest

    PacDbest Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,181
    1
    May 7, 2006
    Our eyes are wide Open. And I'm enjoying what I'm seeing. I'll be there this Saturday & I'm going to see another one.:yep
     
    PacDbest, Mar 10, 2008
    PacDbest, Mar 10, 2008
    #16
  2. PacDbest

    PacDbest Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,181
    1
    May 7, 2006
    I don't dislike Juan. I pick him to win over Campbell. I even put him in my top 10 P4P after He beat Julio. What I don't like are those ESB Members who overrates Juan saying "He'll just dominates Pac" & "Pac can't hurt Juan" etc.

    I don't overrate Pac, He's what he is: " P4P The best 130 lbs & Below Fighter of All time".
     
    PacDbest, Mar 10, 2008
    PacDbest, Mar 10, 2008
    #17
  3. Illmatic

    Illmatic Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,062
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    First off, you said Pac was the greatest fighter ever.

    Secondly, Pac is not the best under 130 fighter of all time. He's not even the best under 130 fighter of this generation.
     
    Illmatic, Mar 10, 2008
    Illmatic, Mar 10, 2008
    #18
  4. lern1079

    lern1079 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,978
    0
    Feb 3, 2005
    I was starting to respect your opinion a little bit until you let your nutthuggery get the best of you
     
    lern1079, Mar 10, 2008
    lern1079, Mar 10, 2008
    #19
  5. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    No he isn't
     
    BigReg, Mar 10, 2008
    BigReg, Mar 10, 2008
    #20
  6. PacDbest

    PacDbest Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,181
    1
    May 7, 2006
    that's how I see him & that's how I rate him.

    Do you know why are you & Me, both haters & huggers, are wasting time here debating about Pac??? Why we spend time watching, analyzing, & keep on watching Pac fights again & again???

    It's Because this Pacquiao is the most Amazing Fighter we have witnessed since the the prime Mike Tyson. Who move up in multiple weightclass & become successful as Pac??? Very few!!! This Guy is an ATG. Respect him & Enjoy him!!!:hi: :hi:
     
    PacDbest, Mar 10, 2008
    PacDbest, Mar 10, 2008
    #21
  7. lern1079

    lern1079 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,978
    0
    Feb 3, 2005
    Freddy Roach is that you?:hi:
     
    lern1079, Mar 10, 2008
    lern1079, Mar 10, 2008
    #22
  8. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
    :yep
     
    reed_man02, Mar 10, 2008
    reed_man02, Mar 10, 2008
    #23
  9. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    i just hate how this works man. you wish the guys who'd challenge pac will all lose. yet, how can juan diaz eat his words when it was not pac who defeated him? boxing math does not work, nate beating juan does not mean pac will beat juan too. so as far as i know, juan diaz' loss is not even remotely related to pac. pac is planned to face the other diaz if he beats jmm. juan is not even in the discussion.
     
    theunderdog, Mar 10, 2008
    theunderdog, Mar 10, 2008
    #24
  10. bronx

    bronx Boxing Junkie banned

    12,190
    0
    Dec 26, 2007

    At 130

    PBF KO Pac
    Freitas (prime) KO Pac
    Casamayor UD Pac
    Corrales KO Pac

    At 126

    Morales (prime) UD or KO Pac
    JMM (prime) UD Pac
    MAB UD Pac
    Guzman KO Pac
    AT 122

    W.Gomez KO Pac
    Morales (prime) UD Pac
    MAB UD Pac

    Just to name a few!
     
    bronx, Mar 10, 2008
    bronx, Mar 10, 2008
    #25
  11. D_knowsboxing

    D_knowsboxing The King is back Full Member

    1,971
    1
    Feb 4, 2008
    if pac is the best fighter under 130, why doesn't he have a '0' in that loss column? Or an '0' in that draw column?:think Inquiring minds want to know.
     
    D_knowsboxing, Mar 10, 2008
    D_knowsboxing, Mar 10, 2008
    #26
  12. bronx

    bronx Boxing Junkie banned

    12,190
    0
    Dec 26, 2007
    He lost to a couple of bums too! This PacDbest dude is a joke man!
     
    bronx, Mar 10, 2008
    bronx, Mar 10, 2008
    #27
  13. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,470
    1,730
    Nov 20, 2007
    My friend, I'm gonna look back here after saturday if JMM pulls this off... It's you who's gonna eat your words...


    The biggest slap in the face will be this:
    Campbell, 36, 5′7″, wins 78% by KO beats young lion Diaz

    now replace the names and a very little correction, and there you go:
    Marquez, 34, 5′7″, wins 73% by KO beats young lion Pac

    All you have to do after Saturday to replace the names here as well:
     
    BigBone, Mar 10, 2008
    BigBone, Mar 10, 2008
    #28
  14. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    i won't even debate you with your other claims but i think it is pretty obvious that jmm does not UD pac at 126 because they actually fought and it was actually a draw.

    guzman will ko pac at 122? are you for real man?
     
    theunderdog, Mar 10, 2008
    theunderdog, Mar 10, 2008
    #29
  15. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Lost in some of the nonsense in this thread, is the irony that resulted from Diaz's statement. He chides Pac for fighting old men, then he goes out and promptly gets his ass kicked by a 36 year old fighter. How ironic.
     
    BigReg, Mar 10, 2008
    BigReg, Mar 10, 2008
    #30
Page 2 of 15
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.