Here's a Quote from Diaz in the past, calling Manny!!!

JMM - One of the judges scored it for him and he got droped 3 times and he was already 31, not his physical prime but still a very good boxer at 29 there is no way that Pac wins.

Guzman - Hell of a puncher at 126 and he is still undefeated unlike your ATG #1 under 130lb guy, he also owns a win over that guy that Pac was avoiding the last two years, Humberto Soto.

 

pac isn't exactly a young lion... he started boxing professionally at age 16. he's therefore been in pro boxing for the past 13 years. campbell, on the other hand, is a late starter with his pro boxing career starting at age 27. that means he's been boxing for about 9 years only.

jmm has been in pro boxing for about 14 years having started at age 20.

 

well said, Diaz losing a good fight to Nate is not a knock on Diaz one bit. Diaz has nothing to be ashamed of, he just got beat by the better fighter that night. Nate finally lived up to his potential, gotta be happy for the old man.

 

humberto soto? are you even serious? what's there to avoid? you read too much boxing news man. i reccomend you actually watch some.

jmm was 29 when he fought pac and that was his prime. and they had a draw. deal with with.

find a post of me calling pac the number 1 pfp at 130 and i will forever be owned by you.

 

i don't think MAB beats pac prime for prime at any weight. as for gomez KOing pac at 122, i also have to disagree with this. gomez may win via decision but i see this match-up as a toss-up.

pac was a virtual monster @122. he never lost at this weight and all of his wins were via KO/TKO. a prime morales and prime pac at this weight would have been a very close fight probably via SD for morales. and no way guzman KOs pac here. it should be the other way around. guzman already had diminished punching power @126.

 

add to that. mab was number one in his division when pac beat him. that just means his was very enar his prime when pacquiao caught him

 

i have to admit i always thought juan diaz was over rated fighting semi retired guy or just guy's with trinket. but i use to think he would just be to big for pac to hurt . that is nolonger the case . i think pac would win a ud. i sure am glad i betted on NAte. and now i can call DIAZ the Baby bull**** again

 

I'm a Pac fan but a boxing fan first.

in the quote you posted

juan diaz says nothing to discredit Pacquiao, and therefore there is no reason for him to eat his words.

"I'd like to show my talent against a fighter of his skills" -- Juan Diaz praises Pacquiao.

"Pacquiao just fought an older Mexican warrior. Now, he ought to fight a young Mexican warrior like me" -- Are you questioning that Barrera is older than Juan Diaz? Its not even questionable just look at their birth dates

stupid thread.

 

Illogical. We are wasting time discussing him because you bring him up in every thread. It has nothing to do with others views on him or his relative greatness.

And he isn't the most amazing fighter since Tyson. We all know that....shame you don't. Most Pacquiao fans know this as well.

 

praise you brother. praise you.

 

Fair enough, and I watch every single live boxing match as well as own a very large collection of fights.

 

Wow.. you really know squad about boxing PacDbest..

 

thats your opinion i dis agree but certainly pac is a great fighter top 20 atg 130 and below some wher between 10 and 20

 

i'm a pac fan but this is already too much... :-(

 

My guess would be that Armstrong is the greatest P4P fighter ever at 130 and below. But of course, he went over the 130 limit so he may not count.

Saddler, Pep...