Enzo by Valero is about right, that's fine. Say the "impossible" happens and Hopkins beats Calzaghe, very, very ugly, in a horrible way, in a split contested decision. Your ranking for Hopkins in those circumstances?
Personally, Haye is still too low, is JMM going to improve that much after he rapes Pac? apart from that I quite like it
One thing I've always wondered is whether chin improves in proportion to size and punch power. Sure, you could take a cruisers punch better if you are that size yourself, but I'm not convinced it would be directly proportional. i.e. If it was possible to place a value on chins, and a cruiser and a super feather were equal the cruiser would still be far more likely to get knocked out I don't think Haye's chin is that bad. He's only really been down to Mormeck who doesn't tickle, and likewise Carl Thompson when he gassed it
The only thing that I would say about the list is about Winky being above Abraham. I think that at this stage of Winky's carrer he is not as good as Abraham is at MW. Apart from that it is great :good
Well, I am not obsessed about the statistics, even when they happen to be "W"s or "L"s, because sometimes there's a world of difference between one win and another. They shouldn't all count the same. I am sure Hopkins is cunning/intelligent enough to make it look very ugly for Calzaghe. But remember, Bika made Calzaghe look awful too and the fight was close! Didn't make Bika a top 10, 20 or even 30 fighter, did it? So, if Hopkins gets the nod because he's managed to disrupt the action so much and makes it a really ugly, horrible (non-really-boxing-fight), Calzaghe will fall some places on my list since he couldn't take charge and stay on top of the situation, but Hopkins won't climb more than a few places for me. (Hopkins cannot get better by cheating or turning it into a non-boxing match). Compare Tszyu v. Hatton, for example. Hatton shouldn't be given as much credit for that win given the way he won, for example. Nor should the faded Tszyu be penalised so much for losing to Hatton, given the way the fight was fought. Hopkins can only get better by implementing a boxing strategy that works in his advantage, shows up his own skills and neutralises the advantage of his opponent as much as possible. If he does all that pretty much by the book and puts in an unexpectedly great performance, he will climb a lot, possibly even over Calzaghe. But that would be a miracle. Calzaghe wouldn't fall that much if he still puts in a very good performance but is beaten by the better man, in that case.
List re-edited; please comment on this list now: Floyd Mayweather Manny Pacquiao Joe Calzaghe Juan Manuel Marquez -------------------- Joan Guzman Ivan Calderon Miguel Cotto Cristian Mijares -------------------- Israel Vazquez Rafael Marquez Mikkel Kessler Juan Diaz -------------------- Chris John Ricky Hatton Kelly Pavlik Chad Dawson Wladimir Klitschko Arthur Abraham Winky Wright - MW Cory Spinks Vernon Forrest Shane Mosley David Haye Jermain Taylor Bernard Hopkins - LHW Fernando Montiel Ruslan Chagaev Lucian Bute Anthony Mundine Edwin Valero Enzo Maccarinelli Any glaring faults with this list?:think I've put Winky down one and Cotto up one (he is more disciplined in implementing the gameplan than Mijares who gets all macho and pays for it, unlike Guzman, who makes them look foolish...don't think it makes much difference, though...same game-park area.
The top 12 are more or less as I would have it, very good Gets a bit more debatable as you go down, but nothing major
In the end, I don't think it matters much whether someone is 2 places up or down around the No. 10 mark...but it matters whether Hopkins is the 4th best in the world, Winky the 9th and whether Pavlik is considered better than them, I think.
That's about right for Haye now I think Hopkins could be a bit higher, but then again I would say that, I want Joe to get credit. His fights have been messy, so under your criteria he can't be too high Pavlik and Winky are right, now he's below Abraham. They could be above Chris John though, I'm definitely not as high on him as you
Think Chris John is unerrated but I am not sure about him either. Someone please advise, if you know him well. Calzaghe is that high despite his recent messy exploits, because of his career and legacy defining fight - Kessler.
Calzaghe behind Pac and JMM?:huh The only thing that keeps Pac above Calzaghe at times in the traditional P4P rankings is his resume, but he's not even close to what Calzaghe is H2H at 168-175.
I cannot make a big difference between Pac and JMM at this stage. They kind of go together. So they would both have to fall together too. We'll watch their fight and Calzaghe's fight against Bhops and then we'll be sure.:good But if Pac v. JMM is contested and close, unless Calzaghe outwits Hopkins and nullifies all his cunning completely, the list stays as it is for me. Not a big difference at the top for me at all.