Herol Graham vs Joe Calzaghe prime for prime

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Dunky McCafferty, Jul 5, 2008.


  1. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    Maybe one day we will actually hear your genuine opinions on fighters, aye.
     
  2. Dunky McCafferty

    Dunky McCafferty Boxing Junkie banned

    10,067
    2
    Aug 24, 2004
    With all due respect onourway, I hate Hatton & dont rate Hatton. Calzaghe IMO is the much superior fighter P4P in the all time british rankings.
    Hatton will get a hometown points decision against the non puncher Malignaggi & then retire. hes only mentioning Pac to get bums on seats cos malignaggi was so bloody awful on the undercard that its killed all interest in the fight. Hattons masterplan was to go out on a high against malignaggi, but Malignaggi ****ed it all up by being crap. Its as simple as that, & I dont want to discuss hatton anymore in this thread, cos he dont deserve it.

    P4P in Britain Calzaghe is the man at this moment, & Im asking about him fighting the enigma that was Herol Graham. We all know Hatton will fight Malignaggi & retire. Hatton is all about picking up belts, not fighting the best. he done that once before, & got his fingers burned so badly he wont make the same mistake again. Trust me. Its Malignaggi & retirement. In that order.
     
  3. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    I've already given my genuine opinion on this fight, and Graham in the past, which is more than we can say for you

    I don't think your knowledge extends outside Hatton, and even there its a bit sketchy.

    I'd also add I admire Graham greatly, I love his style, and I don't have huge objections to anybody that picks him. He can cause stylistic difficulties in this fight, I just don't think he can do it consistently for 12 rounds to outpoint Calzaghe. Nobody gets knocked out here.
     
  4. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    Oh well, unlike Calzaghe (in your books), we all have our faults.
     
  5. onourway

    onourway Haye KTFO1 Wlad Full Member

    5,774
    3
    Mar 31, 2008
    It's hard to be subjective when making a P4P list, so The Ring will do for me.

    How can you criticise Hatton for fighting deadwood? Calzaghe is the king of deadwood.

    As I said, Pavlik and Cotto will quickly jump Calzaghe. And it's a shame for guys like JMM, Vasquez, R Marquez, Hatton etc that they take on the biggest challenges in sport, it results in losses sometimes and they get downplayed a lot, because of this....
     
  6. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Objective would be the word

    Calzaghe clearly hasn't been fighting that much deadwood, especially not recently, as he's #2 on your favourite resource. Quite rightly so, ratings should recognise RECENT performances and achievements, otherwise ****in De La Hoya would be on there

    Anyway, I think we've highjacked Dunky's thread enough - back to Graham - Calzaghe for me.
     
  7. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    I'm with you. If Calzaghe had got in the ring with a prime RJJ, he would not be viewed as half the fighter he is now by some. Thats sad!

    People reward boxers for what they could have done, rather then what they did, far to much.

    Quality of opponent makes a boxer look good. At times Calzaghe looked a chump against Hopkins and yet a world beater against Kessler. There is under six months difference between the fights. If Calzaghe fought manfredo tomorrow he'd once again look like the best boxer on the planet.
     
  8. Fat Joe

    Fat Joe Let's have it right Full Member

    6,255
    0
    Feb 12, 2008
    But he still won
     
  9. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    Yes, he did, I agree.
     
  10. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,600
    Jul 22, 2004
    Calzaghe would have too much for Graham. His workrate would be biggest factor and I think his jab and combination punching would be too much for Graham to handle. Also Graham wouldn't have the firepower to keep Calzaghe off him. Calzaghe by a convincing UD.
     
  11. kurt2006

    kurt2006 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,942
    2
    Mar 5, 2006
    Lets disect this.

    Hatton fought p4p#3 Tszyu :hey

    Thats like Larry Holmes boasting about beating Ali. :lol:

    Mayweather :patsch
    Hatton did not even run him close, Baz Carey gave Khan more problems than Hatton gave PBF.

    Pacman :yep

    Another money fight rather than a fight based on matching skill and ability. With Pacman being way more skilled than Hatton will ever be.

    Anyway back to the thread, Graham would be on top for most the fight and then get KO'd.
     
  12. rumour24tiger

    rumour24tiger Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,718
    2
    Jan 27, 2006
    Calzaghe is a natural light heavy and Graham is a natural light middle. They never would have been in the same weight division.
     
  13. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    78
    Aug 26, 2004
    Amen.

    Joe is a light heavy in the days of the original eight.

    He's too big for a light hitting smaller man like Graham, though if Robin Reid could give him a tough fight then you never know.
     
  14. ron u.k.

    ron u.k. Boxing Addict banned

    4,920
    12
    Feb 14, 2006
    i would take joe here.in fairness to graham he was the best exponent of ingle's style of fighting which i personally can't stand,but graham mainly because he had great balance had it off to a fine art.i just think joe's workrate,extra strength and persistance would win the day in a messy fight of arkward southpaws.dunky's right, grahams chin could only be described as a bit dodgy later in his career i think he'd last the distance with calzaghe.for the most part in his prime his chin was sound,and although it didn't get hit very often,he took the best the likes of mcCallum and kalambay threw at him and lasted.
     
  15. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    I don't think Joe has been facing much deadwood lately.

    In terms of their respective accomplishments, I don't think there is much difference between them - the huggers and haters of each will dissect their records long after they have retired.

    Though in terms of their abilities as fighters, Calzaghe wins hands down. Hatton has made himself as great as he could be, whilst Calzaghe hasn't - some of his 'title defences' were against guys no better than domestic level. There are a few guys on there that shouldn't have been in with Joe, whilst other guys didn't get the fight (Beyer, Johnson, et al) + Reid rematch.

    But you could say the same about Hatton. Guys like Vivian Harris, Kelson Pinto and Lovemore N'Dou would look a damn sight better than Carlos Vilches, Michael Stewart, Ray Oliveira and Dennis Pedersen - that is without mentioning Junior Witter.