Herold Lederman on Marvin Hagler.

I go with the "Destruct & Destroy" Hagler in a brutal fight.

Marvin's southpaw style would be the difference.

 

Maybe...but I think I'd like to show Lederman two pictures. One of his arse and one of a hole in the ground. This way I could be completely sure he knows the difference between the two. In which case I'd be more inclined to entertain his ideas and subject them to honest critical thinking. ...JIM!

 

atsch There's absolutely no way you did not make that. But it's quality.

 

Briscoe was a brutal warrior but I feel Hagler was a class above and beats him ...

 

MMH had too many tools for even a prime Briscoe. Briscoe could never outbox him, and KO him? Never happen MMH had arguably THE best chin ever at middle. Don`t think so? Ask, Cyclone, Bad Bennie, Hitman, The Worm, Vito etc. etc. Nevr on the deck or even wobbled. Roldan pulled him down with cuff behind the head...

 

Maybe he's talking about a different Marvin?

 

Briscoe would've lost to prime Hagler.