HE's BACK, HE's ANGRY, HE's still a FRAUD - HAYEMAKER SPEAKS

the stuff that happened before the fight doesn't change what happened in the ring.

you are a ****** for even suggesting it does.

wladimir promised he'd give haye a "pizza face". he didn't. does that make it a ud to haye?

no. it doesn't.

 

Yes. I dont let my emotions totaly cloud my scoring of fight like most of Klitchko fans seem to let

Oquendo is a guy who is hard to beat clearly, because hes main aim is to spoil the fight by running and hugging.
Oh and tapping a no powered jab to opponents shoulder

Im sure you havent even seen the Batchelder fight so you shouldnt talk about it. Yes it wasnt great performance but Batchelder did nothing to deserve a decission that night.

Yes I do think Toney would give them a hell of a fight.

 

Based on Toney slick defense and counter punching ability. Just think how hard it was for Vitali to hit Johnson. Toney has far better defense than Johnson has and he actually counter punches while using his defense. Even when Toney gets hit he has an iron chin

So Toney uses his slickness, mix in there some deadly accurate laser like counter shots, while dodging Vitalis blows, it’s bound to be a hell of a fight for Vitali.
It wouldn’t be easy to either way but it would be interesting

Oh and I think Toney hits harder than Adamek. Toney has wobled top heavyweights like Sam Peter, Hasim Rahman and John Ruiz with his shots.

 

It was good to read Enzo Mac's RBR a few pages back but...

...unless this is a typo he doesn't know how to score a point deduction :deal

 

Haye crushed the average Enzo with ease, thus the better Haye looks in the future the less embarrassing his 2nd round defeat looks to Haye.

At best if you give Haye every benefit of the doubt he could have won 2 rounds maximum, nothing more. Haye was destroyed, Ibragimov put up a much better fight.

 

**** Haye and his bull****. He doesn't deserve another massive payday against a Klitschko.

 

Haye is good at taking himself into good paydays

 

Some people are so ****ing pussified and sensitive that they hang on to every word a fighter says during the pre-fight. It's silly.


None of that should affect how someone scores a fight. Haye was not "destroyed" or "demolished" as some would suggest. He lost some close rounds, only due to low output, and he landed the best punch of the fight.


People are mad because he didn't "go out on his shield" and give them the satisfaction of seeing him jabbed to death and then KO'ed like all of Wlad's other opponents.

 

enzo & haye don't get on...their has been years of needle beween them...if you actually followed boxing you might have spotted that. he's entitled to his opinion & maybe he was unbiased...altho i doubt he would be biased toward haye (which you say he would be) & as has been pointed out he doesn't seem to be a very well qualified judge seeing as how he doesn't seem to get the intricacies of the rules.

& he was writing in the daily mail which has been one of the chief critics of haye as they try to appeal to the "moral minority" & get outraged over every single thing that happens anywhere ever. the mail had been running an anti-haye campaign since before the harrison fight.

not according to the official scorecards.

or most people who saw both fights. which you clearly didn't.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmoIuAcbIb4[/ame]

 

It's amazing isn't it? Some of these chaps on here with time past would have you believe that Haye wasn't actually detroyed and brushed aside with ease but actually lost a close split decision, who knows, maybe this time next week they will convince themselves that Haye actually won the fight.


:verysad

 

demolished is demolished. either it happened or it didn't. if it didn't happen but you said it did; don't be surprised if people point out you are wrong. cos you're wrong. :tired

anything else you've got to say? i don't care. you're clearly a ******ed chimp bashing away at a keyboard. i don't give a ****. :thumbsup