That must be welsh for 'I know you are right and I have no comeback' or its another **** post :happy:roll:
Your quiet correct i stopped watching Mundines fights a while back whats the point of seeing a talented bloke waste his time fighting on a domestic level when he could have had a solid career at world class level ? watching him beat up smaller blokes down under may float your boat but it dosen't quiet do it for me .
This proves you are an idiot who posts and passes judgment on fights you have not seen, so why comment in a mundine thread in the first place? You can't name a better jab in boxing. The worst thing is as great as we both seem to think calzaghe was, the same **** that gets used to discredit his acheivements and career are being used by you to discredit another boxer. Hypocrite [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cABVNKutErY[/ame] 13 seconds in
lol Joe Calzaghe would never have given up his WBO Supermiddle weight crown to avoid kessler and fight kerry Hope , thats what Mundine has done in effect . and you applaude him for it ?
Best jab in boxing? What about Klitschko's? Dawson's, Kessler's. Theres probably many more too. Mundine's jab is very good, but not great. If it were great he's have been able to use it to effect to pick off Siaca and still play it safe.
Makes no sense (again), don't put words in my mouth and no thats not what mundine has done, another ugly post where again it is evident you know zero about anything. Pecks, Kessler has an excellent jab but he couldnt use it to open ward up and against perdomo he looked like a normal fighter however froch is there to be hit and I expect the 1-2 to win it for kessler. The klitschko's both have solid jabs but are there to be hit after throwing it if their opponents are of similiar reach - watch haye later this year :deal. Chad Dawson - I've only seen the tarver fights so wouldn't want to comment too much but I don't think its his jab that makes him as good as he is.
True, imo Mundines jab is up there with the best in the world. If he used it more he would win much easier than he has been. ****up about the Siaca fight That was nowhere near Mundine at his best.
Makes no sense (again), don't put words in my mouth and no thats not what mundine has done, another ugly post where again it is evident you know zero about anything. Now correct me if i'm wrong ( I'm sure you will what with me being the idiot here ) lol but didn't Mundine run down to middleweight when faced with the prospect of defending the WBA 168lbs title v Kessler ? and did he not attempt to run down to Jr Middle when the IBO ordered a Re-Match with Geale only to fail to make weight and fight Medley @ Middle after all for the WBA international title "Thingy" ?
Its good you recognise that you are an idiot so no need to correct that! If he feels he can be better at middleweight then that's his call after all being a rugby player requires a different physique than boxing so maybe he started too heavy?, a rematch and a possible loss to kessler could have been bad for business. The geale situation is well documented and you are once again regurgitating stuff other people have said. HE BEAT GEALE and dislikes the IBO for the aftermath. As for dropping to 154 why not? and its better to fight for a belt rather than none thus when the ibo was ****ed off the wba int title is fair game. You have already stated that fighters fight for money not legacy e.g. jones jr vs hopkins so why you are trying to be critical of the man is a mystery :conf Being a hypocrite and unable to think for yourself are the only attributes you are showing in your responses you are embarrassing yourself every time you type.
He fought 33 fights at the wrong weight ? Thats your excuse for him Ducking Kessler ? is that it ? :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl later Champ .
No another loss to kessler would have harmed his ability to make $$$$$, another awful misconstrued post by yourself. thick **** learn to read :happy :roll:
33 fights at the wrong weight ? later champ i gotta run , if you go out later don't forget your Bump cap and crayons :good
awful post :happy:roll: You seem unable to engage in a debate about boxing and admit defeat you continue to show yourself up as a deluded hypocrite who knows absolutely nothing about boxing I literally have seen no valid points ever made by you on a fight, fighter or a potential fight. It is either copied from a general consensus on a thread (which it must be because you said you don't watch the fights you go on about), something hypocritical or some sort of 1940s way of talking portraying britain as it was in the 17th century. I can't believe you are older than 14 the way you post. I could argue that alex arthur was current p4p #1 against you and a third party with no boxing knowledge would believe it due to the fact you make no valid points. 20a87 ko1 :deal