Hey, New guy here..just wanna say that a lot of you either dont follow boxing or are

So? WTF do you mean "as if he was supposed to dominste". Said who? You? OR is this another post wher you SAY someone said uit but they really didn't? And one of them was DOMINANT in a win over the other guys. Was it Shane or Hatton? Are we supposed to lok at them as EVEN? atsch Dude...one WAS better then the other.

Do you look to argue ****in everything? Man, you are wrong so much but too stubborn to back off.

 

Like I said. You're too far behind. Read the whole topic.

 

Exactly. stfu wannabe bert sugar

 

He does NOT have to look like prime Shane to be a top contender. So you'd take 4 active WW's to beat Shane. Against a couple of them, he'd easily be a live dog.

So how is Shane irrelevent? Or is it only when he's Margarito's mando?

 

Shane's best victory is over Collazo since losing to Forrest. (DLH fight doesn't count).

His next best is Vargas, Cruz or Estrada. Take your pick.

 

Shane dominates when I say he's old.

Ever heard of styles make fights.

Obviously Hatton wasn't meant to carry 160lbs like he did against Collazo. He still put him on his ass and won.

 

I've read enough Eze. Any thread you're constantly posting in us usually ****.

Eze - There was a rematch clause
Eze later... I THOUGHT there was a clause...

Eze - Shane's shot and irrelevent
Eze later ... Shane hasn't looked PRIME...


Eze - He said Ruiz was the best HW...
Eze Later.... Dude didn't say that...just assumed.

Eze - Lance said Baldiomir would beat Mayweather....
Eze Later...I thought Lance said that.... atsch


Is that enough to show how terrible and inconsisrtent a poster you are? How you jump to conclusions and make ridiculous assumption ALL THE ****IN TIME? :deal

 

No, it counts. So why are you replying to me with this? I didn't ask you to post his recent wins.

YOU said Shane's shot...yet only pick the top 4 WW's to beat him and you should know he'd be a live dog versus any of them. How can a shot guy be a live dog and top 5 in a DEEP division?

 

I thought there was a rematch clause quite a few others have.

The Shane comment doesn't make sense. Shane hasn't looked good or done anything special in years.

If Rahman when he beat Lewis wasen't the best in the division, who was? It certainly wasen't Lewis. Had to be the next rated guy.

Lance I still remembering you saying that, jumping in on the post with Orishaman.

 

Easiest to name is all.

 

Bull**** *******....I was saying from the start that baldomir was an easy fight for Mayweather. And I know that because I had Mayweather fanboys claiming i was saying that to discredit Mayweather's win. So find it or apologize for spreading lies. Man up if you can. :deal

But the reality is, you just proved my point. You'll say anything even if it's untrue or if you haven't even done research or just flat out don't know. Yet you argue on things as if you DO know. that's just plain ridiculous to do. atsch

 

What was the point of naming them? I know who Shane fought, you do to. No one asked... You just think you make some point by naming them. That's what happens when you make assumptions all day long...

 

Bull****. Ive stated that I remember you in the Orishaman post agreeing along side of him. I stated this before and I hold to it.


I tried to look it up, the ESB crashed happened after that.