It's not every day, but it is statistically important, it is there. By "every day" I meant "taught every day". Brad Imes has multiple gogoplatas. High level BJJ or other grappling moves come in handy. Hughes had a incredible front headlock/schultz/arm triangle that is pretty complex.The front headlock is a simple move, but not a simple move to finish with. The point is that it is better to have high level tricky stuff in your arsenal than not. Do you agree with that? Also you will inevitably learn high level moves through training for a long time to get good at basics. Agree with that?
Theres no technical term in BJJ for a "move", if theres no technical term specific to BJJ then we should reffer to the basic definition for a "move" in english which would be literally any technique learned within BJJ. Even if there was it still wouldnt benefit your arguement at all, say if you replace "move" with "submission" then that does seperate some BJJ techniques from others however it says nothing about the skill involved in those techniques. So far your arguement it just to arbitrarily seperate certain parts of BJJ from others and claim that they alone are the areas that require high levels of skill. The only arguenment you've offered to back up this idea is that certain techniques are taught earlier however just because a technique is taught early does not mean its impossible to devolp it to a high level of skill. Techniques that are taight earlier are the core of the sport and the offer a very wild range of skill, its possible to pass someones guard at a very low level but also at an incredabley high level. We teach children maths before we teach them chemistry does that mean that chemistry is the more "skillful" subject? obviously not and infact just the reverse since in order to study chemstry at university its actually your qualifications in maths that are of more importance. We teach maths earlier because its the more important subject that can be devolped to very high levels and used within many others. The "basic" techniques in BJJ are the same, they are taught early because they provide the foundation of the sport and must be devolped to a very high level to suceed, what you consider to be "high level moves" are generally dependant on using "basic" techniques such as positioning well. I await another trollish "no but you didnt understand my arguement" post, the fact is I and everyone else here understand it just fine, its you who are either looking to save face/get attension or lack the ability to understand the criticism of your highly simplistic arguement.
