Higher ATG: Wladimir Klitschko or Mike Tyson?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by AnotherFan, Nov 16, 2014.


  1. AnotherFan

    AnotherFan Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,221
    2
    Dec 20, 2010
    Unless Wlad is the hardest hitting boxer of all times, he is at least on level with the absolute best power punchers there ever was. I agree Tyson lands more shots, but Wlad has the advantage of reach which is neat.
     
  2. Gneus7

    Gneus7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,277
    495
    Mar 29, 2007
  3. deadACE

    deadACE Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,228
    1,009
    Apr 13, 2014
    Lewis.
     
  4. CrossedLine

    CrossedLine Active Member Full Member

    1,213
    2
    Jul 23, 2011
    Depends what criteria. H2H Tyson has it, fame Tyson has it, promoting the sport (albeit infamously) Tyson has it. When we talk about longevity and reign, Wlad kills it, and coming back from adversity Wlad has it.

    I'd say Tyson, cause I'm racist, obviously.
     
  5. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010

    but then any one of tysons title victims would go unbeaten against wlads entire title defence set.

    if they could maintain longevity and interest that long of course.
     
  6. Outstock

    Outstock PBR Full Member

    1,370
    241
    Mar 31, 2013
    Mike Tyson - 8 defences of the Undisputed HW Title

    Wlad - Zero.
    .......................................................................

    Tyson- Two time fighter of the year 1986. 1988

    Wlad- Zero

    ......................................................................

    Tyson- PPV Sensation and global superstar

    Wlad- Zero PPV

    ...............................

    Tyson- Rated #1 hardest hitter of all time by ESPN
    Rated #16 hardest puncher of all time by Ring.
     
  7. Peppermint

    Peppermint Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,014
    18
    Sep 7, 2010
    Tyson. Size disadvantage vs. size advantage.
     
  8. Techniques

    Techniques Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,936
    2
    Jan 23, 2011
    wlad hasnt fought anybody, and hes boring as **** and NEVER interested me, the only fight that interested me was the david haye fight
     
  9. HeavyweightCP

    HeavyweightCP Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,424
    62
    Oct 16, 2011
    Tyson fought better fighters than Wlad and was a overall better fighter than Wlad H2h beat and Wlad has better longevity but tyson is the greater heavyweight he was better than Wlad Larry Holmes even in 88 Is better than any fighter Wlad has beat
     
  10. AnotherFan

    AnotherFan Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,221
    2
    Dec 20, 2010
    The arguments for Mike Tyson beeing the higher ATG are still fairly weak. "Wlad hasn't fought anybode" and "ancient Larry Holmes better than todays prime top contenders" isn't very knowledgeable. Just average fanboyism.

    Which boxers Mike fought were so great and why?
     
  11. HeavyweightCP

    HeavyweightCP Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,424
    62
    Oct 16, 2011
    You are not knowledgable on the sport name one fighter in the top ten that's beats Holmes of 88 he had great win later vs a prime ray mercer dude heavyweight boxing is god awful just watch you know stupid you sound saying the top dudes today are better than besides Wlad wig beats Holmes of 88 today?
     
  12. Manning

    Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,443
    1,024
    Mar 6, 2011
    [yt]?v=U2vRywLpXg4[/yt]
     
  13. Manfred

    Manfred Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,187
    5,402
    May 22, 2011
    Gents, Wlad is not even listed as an ATG period. Tyson is so that should tell you something. Like uhh maybe Wlad ain't shiiitt.:lol:
     
  14. dan4579

    dan4579 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,269
    420
    Apr 11, 2011
    Povetkin
     
  15. brb

    brb Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,133
    64
    Sep 14, 2010
    Your grammar is terrible.

    Coulda, woulda, shouda.