I ask this because on the recent top 50 posted I saw him list Joe Frazier as just missing out, with Morales not even getting so much as a mention. I feel Frazier has the better overall win, but Morales having one of the more impressive resumes of the last 10 years. It's stacked at the top end with prime Barrera and Pacquiao, and it has depth with Hernandez, Chavez, Chi, Jones, and Zaragoza. Guess what I'm saying, I would have Morales higher, but do people agree with that? He spanned more weights, has the better resume, in my judgment, and longevity goes to Morales too.
Disagree with both these points, going from 122-130lbs while weight draining to be the bigger man is not as impressive as taking on any and everyone from 175-Infinity Resume lets see: Ali - Pacquaio - Ali's a better boxer, both forces of nature, Ali was a bit past prime, Pac was in his first fight at 130lbs. Advantage Frazier Foreman-MAB - Morales acquited himself better than the smaller MAB (morales typically added 10lbs++ of water weight after weigh in, MAB did not). I had MAB winning all 3 bouts, the first was a robbery. Frazier got destroyed by Foreman Advantage Morales Jimmy Ellis - Junior Jones - Both had put quality wins together, Ellis had beat some of the best like Patterson, Leotis Martin, Bonavena and Quarry. Jones has the big Barrera won, I thought MAB won the rematch though. Jones was also coming off a loss to MkKinney when Morales faced him Advantage Frazier Quarry/Foster - Chavez/Old Zaragoza/Hernadez/Ayala - Quarry and Foster seemed better boxers than these beating Patterson/SHavers/Lyle/Tiger etc between them, but these wins are quite close in quality Advantage - About Equal Also bare in mind Morales missed allot of names in those weight classes, he missed top titlists like Bungu/Vasquez from 122, he missed Hamed/Marquez/Harrison from 126, Casamayor and Freitas wanted him at 130 and he only moved up when the division was empty, the forementioned were willing to move down to make fights with him too when they got to 135. Frazier fought all the top names, and he could have been champion for far longer if he avoided Foreman and didnt rematch Ali. Morales didnt truly step up until he faced MAB in 2000 Missing Top Names - Advantage Frazier
Well you can't disagree with the part that says Morales spanned more weigh divisions, because he did. Through no fault of Joe's who was a legitimate Heavyweight. You're doing the old trick of adding an angle to every secnerio. For instance. You go Pacquiao was at his first fight at 130lbs, whereas I say Muhammad Ali had fought two fights in three years and was obviously inactive, and for my money, past his very best. You say Morales missed out a lot of top names, but he beat the best at 122lbs (Barrera), he took on the best at 126 (Barrera), Hamed didn't want any part of Erik, and he fought the best at 130 (Barrera, Pacquiao). There's a 4 pound difference between Feather and Super, Pacquiao was every bit as excellent at that weight as he was down at 126lbs. You make good points otherwise, they are close in terms of resume, but I think Chavez, Ayala, Hernandez, and Chi, all former world champions, has to count for a lot more than beating Quarry, who never held the title, and Ellis, who only held the title because it was vacant.
Why? resume - Close, I give the edge to Morales with depth Longevity - Morales fought at the top level for 10 years, Frazier had 3-4 years. Then you coupled that with Morales spanning three weight divisions, winning world titles in all of them, I have to give the nod to Erik. The fact Frazier could never seem to recover from his first defeat is a factor, plus Morales beat the two best opponents of his career, whereas Frazier was beaten 2-1 by Ali, and blown out on two separate occasions by Foreman. He was pretty much prime time for the first Foreman bout. Please, educate me otherwise.
Probably because Frazier was champion in the golden age of HW fighters and beat the GOAT Heavyweight and gave him 2 good fights in 2 losing efforts. His only losses come against Top 10 HW - 1 being a terrible style disadvantage and the other being a top 10 fighter of all time.
I don't think it's a solid lock either way, the only way you could swing it to an undisputed status is if you give heavy credit to Morales' dodgy decisions. I don't see it, you can argue for either man.
And you think that's enough? He beat Muhammad Ali after a long lay off, and that remains as a fact. Am I trying to discredit Frazier's victory? Absolutely not, but I believe Morales beat Marco and Pacquiao, two of the greatest little men of the last 30-40 years, when they were both at their best physically. Let's not put so much emphasis on who each fighter lost too, but rather who they beat. Frazier beat Muhammad Ali, Jerry Quarry, Buster Matthis, and Jimmy Ellis. Morales beat Marco Antonio Barrera, Manny Pacquiao, Paulie Ayala, Junior Jones, and Jesus Chavez. You give the nod to Joe Frazier?
Frazier was just a higher level of fighter, I can tell that when I watch the both of them fight. I could never see Morales beating a fighter the caliber of Ali or turning in a performance like the one Frazier did. As far as their resumes go, Frazier has: Ali (a far better win than Morales ever had) Bonavena X2 Quarry X2 Foster Ellis X2 Mathis Machen Jones Bugner Morales had: Pacquiao Barrera Ayala McCullough Jones Zaragoza Chavez Hernandez Kelley Pretty close, but again I could never see Morales beating a fighter the caliber of Ali, and I consider Frazier the better, more effective fighter in his prime.
1. The point is Fraziers weight class spans 100lbs+, he took on bigger men, Morales weight classes spanned 8 measley pounds and he took on smaller men, maybe bar Diaz and you see Morales as doing more because if you have 2 shits you move down 2 divisions? 2. I mentioned Ali was past prime, I simply mentioned Ali is better than Pac P4P, most would agree, Pac was in his first fight at 130lbs that is a big factor in the fight 3. The bottom line many fights were missed in Morales career, there's no reason a Marquez fight couldnt have come off other than he was a dangerous fight for Morales 4. They are titlists who picked up vacant belts too, not real world champions, look at Chi/Chavez/Hernadez who all won vacant belts just like Ellis and tell me the best win between then - which is it Michael Brodie? Does it trump a Patterson win? I think f*cking not!!!
Its got to be Morales P4P. He was one of the most exciting fighters i have ever seen, he jumped divisions and was still exciting. A shot Morales was still able to give you mini-classics like the 3 fights with Pac (he was shot in the second and third "mini-Hagler-Hearns" fights) and Diaz. Every fight was a war and he always came out on top (prior to Barrera and until the second fight with Barrera). Frazier was a great Heavyweight.
i rank frazier higher than morales. frazier wasn't stopped by men his size like morales did and did well against many of the bigger than him by margins morales never had to face. so despite neither is in my top 10 frazier higher.