Higher P4P: Joe Frazier or Erik Morales

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Addie, Nov 11, 2009.


  1. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    402
    Jun 14, 2006

    He did look good against Quarry there, to be honest. Okay, Frazier may have still had a little left after Foreman, but perhaps we should also be crediting Morales with giving Pacquiao hell in their second fight, and fighting a bigger man in Diaz and in most peoples eyes, winning in 07. In any event, Morales still trumps him on longevity, and the ability to bounce back from defeat.
     
  2. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    94
    Dec 26, 2007
    Not really. We're giving Frazier credit for giving the greatest of all time hell in a close loss, you're giving Morales credit for giving David Diaz hell in a close loss. Morales didn't really bounce back at all post Pacquiao, losing to the likes of Raheem in the process, while Frazier dominated guys like Quarry and Bugner. I'd definitely say Frazier bounced back more convincingly when past his prime. And as we've just shown, Morales really doesn't hold much an edge in either longevity or resume, if any at all.

    In that case, it all comes down to ability, and in my eyes Frazier was more proven and quite a ways more efficient at his best than Morales. For that reason, he holds the clear edge in this debate.
     
  3. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,561
    Jul 28, 2004
    No disrespect intended for Morales, who's a great fighter/warrior, but Frazier's performance in the FOTC, and the significance of it tops anything by Morales.
     
  4. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    This content is protected


    Anyway, i'm off to bed.