Highest ranked fighters with least impressive wins on their resume?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ChrisPontius, Mar 7, 2009.


  1. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,094
    45,098
    Apr 27, 2005
    Toney i totally agree but does Hopkins really need excuses? Toney was fully established and at the supposed top of his game at that time. He might have been P4P number 2 i think.

    By comparison Hopkins was eons off his top work and while still good he was held in no great regard at the time. He wasn't a patch on what he was to become. Of course to be fair Jones was inexperienced finding his feet too tho he had great fanfare and exposure at the time. Of course the result may well have not changed later anyway but the fact is this fight was fought with Hopkins no-where near his best.

    Toney tho is an entirely different matter and given the total schooling Jones put on him has to be rated a real top shelf win. With Jones it wasn't just the sheer class of whom he was beating, but how he was beating them also. He was making good solid fighters look like clowns.
     
  2. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    Funny enough, the '70s featured four dominant HOF champions from lightweight to light-heavyweight - Duran, Napoles, Monzon, Foster - that you could make a case dominated somewhat weak-ish divisions. Their title reigns generally featured couple of big wins spread out among stretches of so-so challengers.

    Of course, unlike the other three, Duran went on to amass a great resume above his weight class.
     
  3. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    only saldivar is a hall of famer there and saldivar was very past his prime when jofre beat him..
     
  4. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,059
    3,564
    Dec 18, 2004

    You could say that about most fighters who remained in their division though. Hagler's title reign is full of (in your words) "so-so challengers", with the exception of those champs who moved up in weight. Larry Holmes' reign can be called weak also. In fact, you'll find most dominant champs since the war, who stayed mainly on one division, also come into this category. Part of it is down to them being so dominant that top contenders never got the chance to make a name for thermselves.
     
  5. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    suppose he would be a top guy.

    but if a guy fought 200 times and beat all the top contenters like Willie and theres noone left to fight. he cant help it can he.

    but i see where you are getting at though tha porportioanlly its not so great
     
  6. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Adds Dempsey and Holmes to the list
     
  7. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    I was mainly referring to Toney's fans. I've heard anything at the General Forum (and some here) from "He went down from 200lbs to 160lbs in two weeks" to "He lost on purpose to get back at his manager, as evidenced by the fact that he threatened to shoot her the day after the fight". :lol:


    Back to Hopkins: i agree that he hadn't hit his peak yet, but it's not like he was a stranger to boxing either. He was at his physical peak and i think his aggressive style matches up better with Roy than the defensive, counter punching style that he later adopted. A naturally gifted speedster always matches up well with those type of fighters. And while we're talking about Hopkins, there's always two sides of the coin; Jones was just as inexperienced. In fact, Hopkins had more pro fights than Jones, even if it was only two more. Jones hadn't matured into his natural weight class either, while Hopkins had.

    So, i don't see how this is not a great win for Jones (not that you're claiming that - but some people are).
     
  8. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Holmes is a good one. The Norton, Witherspoon and Mercer wins are excellent, but considering he often ranks in the top5 (he does in mine), he's definitely one of those fighters of quantity over quality.
     
  9. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,628
    713
    May 22, 2007
    I knew I was gonna ***** slapped for that comment, lol.
     
  10. CottoDaBodykill

    CottoDaBodykill Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,735
    15
    Apr 6, 2008
    jake beat holman man
     
  11. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    You could say Jofre's very best wins came at feather whereas its bantamweight where he's predominantly rated as an elite level great. Just saying, but i ont knock the man.
     
  12. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    Toney was weight drained. It's one of those fights where the evidence is clearly in the viewing of the fight. Gil Clancy commented during the ring walk "he's going to be fighting like he has concrete shoes on" as Toney came into the ring at 184lbs. He was gasping for breath during the second round. Toney whole physical demeanour wasn't what it had been in previous fights. His timing was off, he wasn't busy, and at times he could hardly get off with punches, even when he had opportunties to do so. Excluding what Jones was doing, Toney was lethargic in everyway possible. I'm not trying to take credit away from Jones' win, as his excellent skills and speed were also part of the reason for the drubbing Toney recieved.

    Not sure about dropping 40lbs in 2 weeks like some claim. Thats probably nonsense. I did ask Jackie Kallen, Toney's manager, on my Myspace if his weight weight problems were as bad as reported leading up to the Jones fight, she said "yes".

    Tarver also showed similar signs against Hopkins. Very much the same regarding workrate and blowing not too long into the fight.
     
  13. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Everyone that Jones fought at 160/168 looked like they had concrete in their shoes and arms.



    Wow, well if an objective person makes that kind judgment, then i guess that's the end of the discussion. :good
     
  14. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,655
    13,056
    Apr 1, 2007
    Why are Toney and Jackie on such terrible terms now, out of curiosity?
     
  15. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    You suggesting he wasn't weight drained? Ohhh dear. I liked this part "Everyone that Jones fought at 160/168 looked like they had concrete in their shoes and arms" you were a smart cookie with that counter. Very smart indeed. A great way for you to support your claim Toney was fine and dandy.

    Toney clearly showed the signs of being a weight drained fighter more than any fighter I'd seen up until De La Hoya's against Pacquaio. Not punching, tiring quickly, and generally looking a shell of himself regarding reflexes and speed. He was usually a demon counter puncher. But he wasn't even hitting fresh air on a regular basis as he could hardly lift his arms to punch. He went into a defensive shell continually which invited Jones onto him even more.

    I can only suggest you have never seen how a weight drained fighter performs or the type of signs during a performance to show the evidence. If Toney isn't showing you signs during the Jones performance, then god knows.

    If thats the way you see it, fair enough. You said it, not me. :good