History of lineal heavyweight champs (Video)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Nov 25, 2017.


  1. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    Oh snap! Haha. Boy, how I hope that now happens...
     
  2. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    Well dude there's a decent chance that Joshua/Wilder/Parker end up establishing a clear lineage. And then say Fury comes back in another 2 years. Then you would recognize Fury as lineal champ and no longer recognize the newly established one? That sounds an awful lot like having it "conferred retrospectively by officials..." What do you say about that? I totally respect your explanation so far and nobody's wrong but that just sounds messed up.

    The lineal title isn't tangible. We each have our own, really. It makes debating it so fun and frustrating at the same time.
     
  3. Sandman_

    Sandman_ Undisputed Full Member

    5,158
    6,706
    Feb 20, 2009
    Joshua/Wilder/Parker can't establish a clear lineage unless they beat Tyson Fury (unless of course Fury never returns in which case they can).

    The ultimate winner of Joshua/Wilder/Parker will be in the same situation as Mike Tyson was in 1987.

    Tyson had unified the WBC, WBA & IBF titles (against Trevor Berbick, Bonecrusher Smith & Tony Tucker respectively) but hadn't won the lineal championship b/c he hadn't beaten Spinks.

    Spinks won the IBF title (and lineal championship) against Larry Holmes but wouldn't defend against the mandatory Tony Tucker so the IBF stripped him.

    So Spinks was stripped of the IBF title but retained the lineal championship.

    Mike Tyson himself recognised the importance of the lineal championship by fighting Spinks instead of ignoring him. A good thing he did too. I personally recognise Tyson as the best heavyweight there ever was (when he was at his best). I don't think that claim could be made had he not closed the loop by annihilating Spinks & legitimizing his claim to the crown.

    Very similar to Ali-Frazier. While boxing officialdom may have stripped Ali, once he returned, his earlier claim to the lineal championship was enlivened.

    What it means is boxing championships are determined in the ring, not by sanctioning bodies or officialdom.

    What we're also left with if Joshua/Wilder/Parker unify and Tyson Fury stays unbeaten, is what we had when Ali returned to fight Frazier & Spinks fought Tyson: a massive fight between two unbeaten guys with legitimate claims to the heavyweight championship.

    Makes sense to me!
     
    Last edited: Nov 28, 2017
    Nay_Sayer likes this.
  4. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Nice work as always but you are mistaken about when Wlad claimed the Lineal title. That didn't happen until he beat Povetkin..
     
    Sandman_ likes this.
  5. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    I might rate Johnson Jeffries and Louis Schmeling over Ali Frazier I for FOTC...
     
    Sandman_ likes this.
  6. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    ^This

    The Ring and the Alphabet organizations with their trinkets don't get to decide who is or who isn't a champion. That gets decided in the ring.
     
    Sandman_ likes this.
  7. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    Vitali fought Charr in Sept. 2012.
    Wladimir fought Povetkin in Oct. 2013.

    If a fighter drops out of the rankings after 1 year of not fighting then Wladimir vs. Povetkin deservedly created lineage.
     
  8. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    That comes down to each persons own opinion, if the two fighters are 1 vs. 2, if the retired guy is still the champ, etc. No opinion can be definitively wrong, even with the criteria that it is decided in the ring. I think everyone is saying it is decided in the ring... Random; what is funny is that we don't retroactively question the ol' single title days, haha.
     
  9. Sandman_

    Sandman_ Undisputed Full Member

    5,158
    6,706
    Feb 20, 2009
    I see a lot of parallels between how the heavyweight division is placed now & how it was positioned 30 years ago at the beginning of 1987.

    You have an undefeated guy tearing it up wanting to unify (Joshua/Tyson), you have an undefeated lineal champ who is inactive but wants to reassert his credentials (Fury/Spinks), an undefeated rising cruiserweight who will be a factor in the division before too much longer (Usyk/Holyfield) and a couple of decent (mostly undefeated) alphabet title holders who want a piece of the action (Parker/Wilder/Bonecrusher/Tucker).

    Looking forward to seeing everyone get their chance & how it plays out over the next couple of years.
     
    Last edited: Nov 28, 2017
    rapscalion likes this.
  10. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    As far as lightweights, Roberto Duran was the best light heavyweight champion in boxing history! He also had Ray Arcel and Freddie Brown in his corner!
     
  11. Daddy

    Daddy Active Member Full Member

    1,101
    355
    Nov 16, 2004
    IMO, your best work. No pauses or breaks. No second guesses. Facts, facts, facts. Very very well done good Sir. Keep up the great work.
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  12. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,537
    15,994
    Jul 19, 2004
    Even if what you say is technically true, assuming Fury fights again (which I think he almost certainly will), it's going to be difficult for someone else to make a true claim as long as Fury continues winning.
     
  13. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,537
    15,994
    Jul 19, 2004
    I agree with a lot of what you said, and I especially agree with your conclusion. With the way things are now, so many alphabet titles, politics preventing the very best from facing the very best, and a slew of other factors - that to me, the Lineage still goes through Fury.

    In the post-Lewis era, I think a better overall way of looking at things might be just to look at the perceived dominant force that arises in the years following a champion who retires. By that logic, I think most observers would objectively agree that Vitali was the top guy in 2004-05, and that Wlad was the dominant force from 2006-2015.

    With Fury beating Wlad, and it being almost certain Fury will fight again, I think someone needs to beat Fury. If Fury never does come back, then whenever the dust settles, between Joshua, Wilder, Parker, and perhaps another, someone will emerge as the consensus best eventually. But the added problem today, stems from BS politics preventing the best fights from happening WHEN they should happen.
     
    Sandman_ likes this.
  14. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,537
    15,994
    Jul 19, 2004
    If Fury came back in another 2 years, that would be 4 years of inactivity, and by then, I think we'd have an idea if he was completely done. Had Fury been a 40 year old man when he defeated Wlad, maybe it would be a little bit different. But it's a unique situation of sorts, given that Fury is still young, and I think he clearly has intentions of fighting again. Historically speaking, there have been other champions who've gone years without defending the title. It was a long time ago, and the entire landscape was much different - but I still think the idea of "tracing the lineage" is a worthwhile endeavor.

    And in the heavyweight examples, I think it's always worked itself out whenever it was in temporary disarray. The best of the division usually seized claim to the lineage at some point during their respective reigns of dominance. It's becoming trickier with alphabet trinkets everywhere, and the best not fighting the best when they should. But for me? I'll have a hard time buying claim to a new lineage as long as Fury seems genuinely interested in fighting again.

    :thumbsup:
     
    Sandman_ likes this.