Hold up, is pac ww title on the line?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rooney, Dec 5, 2009.


Page 2 of 12
  1. Rooney

    Rooney Boxing Junkie banned

    7,654
    0
    Jul 31, 2009
    They write totally different.
     
    Rooney, Dec 5, 2009
    Rooney, Dec 5, 2009
    #16
  2. dits

    dits Active Member Full Member

    1,011
    0
    Oct 7, 2007
    You gotta think they'll put the belt on the line just to give the fight more gravitas as if it needed any. This fight is gonna be epic.
     
    dits, Dec 5, 2009
    dits, Dec 5, 2009
    #17
  3. hagman1989

    hagman1989 the boxing site , try it Full Member

    8,284
    1
    Dec 13, 2008
    i think there has to be a world title at stake just for the casual fan
    they wouldnt understand fight of the century does not need a world title if were honest
     
    hagman1989, Dec 5, 2009
    hagman1989, Dec 5, 2009
    #18
  4. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006

    i think they're different. Just sharing the same fetish.:yep
     
    boxbox, Dec 5, 2009
    boxbox, Dec 5, 2009
    #19
  5. Totomabs

    Totomabs Sauna Belt Holder Full Member

    4,226
    0
    Dec 9, 2007

    :rofl
     
    Totomabs, Dec 5, 2009
    Totomabs, Dec 5, 2009
    #20
  6. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Well maybe you haven't read and encountered the lunatic this much . . . :D

    . . . but the common "lol' after each posts is classic. :yep

    . . . and why do you think Jeff M will open up a thread protecting Nallege in the Lounge? Can anybody explain that?
     
    psychopath, Dec 5, 2009
    psychopath, Dec 5, 2009
    #21
  7. Rooney

    Rooney Boxing Junkie banned

    7,654
    0
    Jul 31, 2009
    By the way go hang yourself from your bunk bed.

    There has hardly ever been any talk of Pac title being on the line. They should hype that part up more, mayweather will be a 7 time world champion in 5 different weight classes.:D

    And would have won the WW title at the WW limit:rofl
     
    Rooney, Dec 5, 2009
    Rooney, Dec 5, 2009
    #22
  8. Rooney

    Rooney Boxing Junkie banned

    7,654
    0
    Jul 31, 2009
    No need to worry pac gets to keep the diamond belt lol
     
    Rooney, Dec 5, 2009
    Rooney, Dec 5, 2009
    #23
  9. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Yeah STUPID and MORON as you are . . . you don't have common sense.

    What's the use of Pacquiao keeping a title at 147 if he loses a fight at 147? Can you answer that . . . dickhead?

    Now you go hang yourself. :hi:
     
    psychopath, Dec 5, 2009
    psychopath, Dec 5, 2009
    #24
  10. Rooney

    Rooney Boxing Junkie banned

    7,654
    0
    Jul 31, 2009
    What the point of Pac winning a world title at 147 yet he fought at a catchweight of 145 to win the belt.

    Can you answer that dickhead?
    :rofl:rofl:rofl

    I guess the diamond belt wasn't enough LMAO
     
    Rooney, Dec 5, 2009
    Rooney, Dec 5, 2009
    #25
  11. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Oh yes asswipe . . . because Cotto agreed to put the belt on the line at a catchweight. Is your brain absorbing that? Is it hard to understand that welter is 141 to 147? :rofl

    Why was Sugar Ray Leonard a recognised as a light heavy weight title holder when he fought La Londe below the limit? Can you asnwer that moron?

    I guess not . . . that's should be too much for your brain. :lol:
     
    psychopath, Dec 5, 2009
    psychopath, Dec 5, 2009
    #26
  12. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006

    Maybe the answer was already given a long time ago, where the greats did the same thing:yep
     
    boxbox, Dec 5, 2009
    boxbox, Dec 5, 2009
    #27
  13. Rooney

    Rooney Boxing Junkie banned

    7,654
    0
    Jul 31, 2009
    Cotto hand was ****ing forced, he never wanted the catchweight for his WW title. But he had no choice, this was a top rank event. Arum the boss.

    YOU REMEMBER PAC, NO BELT NO FIGHT:lol::lol::lol:
     
    Rooney, Dec 5, 2009
    Rooney, Dec 5, 2009
    #28
  14. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Lay low on the guy bruh . . . I now realized that he is not playing dumb . . . it's natural . . . he is really dumb as ****. :D :yep
     
    psychopath, Dec 5, 2009
    psychopath, Dec 5, 2009
    #29
  15. Rooney

    Rooney Boxing Junkie banned

    7,654
    0
    Jul 31, 2009
    So that makes it right:patsch
     
    Rooney, Dec 5, 2009
    Rooney, Dec 5, 2009
    #30
Page 2 of 12