Holmes from the Norton fight vs Patterson from Ingo 2

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Feb 27, 2025.


Who wins and how

  1. Patterson KO/TKO

    5.3%
  2. Holmes KO/TKO

    68.4%
  3. Patterson Decision

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Holmes Decision

    26.3%
  5. Draw

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Devon

    Devon Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,448
    5,638
    Dec 31, 2018
    Holmes wasn’t just a jab, Patterson was very good at taking away the jab, but Holmes had the uppercut that Patterson was open for, also Holmes was decent at planting his feet and timing guys’ head movement, he’d jab at Patterson to get him to start ducking and to try to close the range, then he’d time him with the uppercut, then follow up with combinations as he is then blinded momentarily, he’d even go to the body, then with the straight as he tries to exit.

    I suspect Holmes beats him relatively comfortably late stoppage or on points.
     
  2. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,084
    20,578
    Jul 30, 2014
    These comments are getting comical at this point. There’s not a single opponent of Holmes in his prime (aside from perhaps Cobb but I’m pretty sure even he got a round or so from at least one judge) who hadn’t won a minute of a round. Even Berbick won 2 rounds on a card or two.

    I’m starting to wonder if anyone here has actually watched the guy fight.

    These dominate performances people predict for him in these H2H matchups were non-existent in his prime against the rather mediocre opposition he actually faced.
     
  3. slash

    slash Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,539
    2,803
    Apr 15, 2012
    Holmes won't get chinned. Patterson might.
     
  4. Philosopher

    Philosopher Active Member Full Member

    1,440
    2,239
    Aug 10, 2024
    I'm not suggesting he dominated against his opponents, he was in some life and death wars. I'm going to pull my usual card from my back pocket...styles make fights. Floyd does not have the power to gain Holmes respect, he does not have the strength to win inside, he was an explosive mid to short range fighter, a fighter I love watching, and respect hugely, but he simply wouldn't safely make it into his preferred range against Holmes and if he did get there, he'd simply be tied up and spoiled. I think Holmes realises Floyd can't hurt him after the first minute or so and starts sitting down on his punches, busting the smaller man up with stinging jabs and straight rights. Holmes is on a different level to Floyd in my opinion, you disagree and that's cool brother, it wouldn't be much of a discussion forum if we all felt the same. Have a wonderful day swag, peace and love, gbn x
     
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,879
    44,638
    Apr 27, 2005
    Patterson has got oodles of power. The guy could punch. I'm not saying he beats Holmes or anything but to opine Patterson couldn't hurt Holmes is drawing a rather long bow. If he lands his best Holmes would know it.
     
  6. Philosopher

    Philosopher Active Member Full Member

    1,440
    2,239
    Aug 10, 2024
    70% or so KO rate i think, yes, he had decent explosive power, but he had to be in his range to use it...and i don't think Holmes let's him work in that range, and this is the crux of my point. If Floyd is able to get 'inside' and work for sure he could hurt Larry but I don't think he can. His biggest wins are maybe Bonavena and Quarry who let him fight that way and were similarly invested in those types of fights. He lost against boxers with good jabs, good distance control and decent power like Liston, Ali and Ellis. Holmes fits the latter category and wears it comfortably, doesn't he? I am a fan of Holmes, and I'm definitely not saying he couldn't be beaten by a smaller man... Spinks showed he could be. Just not one with Patterson's style. And before someone shouts Tyson...Tyson was a phenom who could get into 'his' distance and throw, his speed and accuracy was on a different level to Floyd's, and cats being cats, with pigeons being pigeons...I think peak Holmes beats Tyson whilst at the same time rating Mike's defeat of Holmes as one of the best and most compelling of his career.
     
  7. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,879
    44,638
    Apr 27, 2005
    You wording was actually "Floyd does not have the power to gain Holmes respect," and "I think Holmes realises Floyd can't hurt him after the first minute or so and starts sitting down on his punches".

    How does Holmes know Floyd can't hurt him if he hasn't hit him? Would it be safe to assume Holmes thought Snipes couldn't hurt him?

    Obviously Holmes would be heavily favored to beat Patterson. Would it be as simple as turning up like you seem to imply? Maybe, maybe not. I find it difficult to believe Holmes beats the tar out of him without tasting a little bit of leather. Patterson has insane handspeed and isn't afraid to have a good crack.
     
  8. Philosopher

    Philosopher Active Member Full Member

    1,440
    2,239
    Aug 10, 2024
    I certainly don't think Holmes just has to turn up man. We are talking about a very good version of Holmes here, and I thought I had explained what I mean about Patersons power in my post. I think Holmes wins every minute of this...that does not mean he just has to turn up. You have to be a very good, possibly great fighter to beat Floyd. And I think Holmes was, and for the reasons I have suggested. If my post with regards his power wasn't clear, I apologise, but for me, at that level, 3 minutes is more than enough to assess how likely the other man is to put your lights out. Other opinions are available, and equally valid man, as you are so admirably proving. For me Holmes v Paterson is as one sided as the Liston fights, without the accelerated denoument, or the Ali ones. I usually have Holmes in my top 3, always in my top 5. But...it's only an opinion
     
    Last edited: Mar 1, 2025
  9. PRW94

    PRW94 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,169
    3,779
    Nov 26, 2020
    Did Holmes have the raw power to create fear or intimidation in Floyd, a la Liston?

    I agree that Holmes is on a different level than Patterson … I don’t think there was anyone better save Ali and Louis, while I have Floyd at the tail end of my Top 20 … and he comfortably wins this fight, but the biggest reason is his 10-inch reach advantage and his roughly 25-pound weight advantage which as you noted will make it difficult for Floyd to do his thing.

    Floyd connects cleanly with a left hook like in Johansson 2, Larry is going on his ass. The problem is Floyd being able to connect.
     
  10. Philosopher

    Philosopher Active Member Full Member

    1,440
    2,239
    Aug 10, 2024
    We make similar points. I did suggest a fight against Larry would not have a similar sudden ending like Liston...And let's be charitable. If Floyd did connect with that leaping left, Larry might well go down. But he's getting up, of that I'm pretty sure. Stopped once from memory, and by Tyson no less..
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta and PRW94 like this.
  11. PRW94

    PRW94 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,169
    3,779
    Nov 26, 2020
    Yeah Larry was hard to keep down. Earnie Shavers learned that. Floyd just had some pop for his size. I don’t think he had KO pop for Holmes.
     
  12. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,440
    9,427
    Jul 15, 2008
    Holmes .
     
  13. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,655
    11,518
    Mar 23, 2019
    This. The uppercut would punish Floyd until the end.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  14. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,297
    11,748
    Sep 21, 2017
    Are you sure?
     
  15. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,147
    25,345
    Jan 3, 2007
    Realistically I think Holmes could get a TKO win sometime in the later rounds perhaps between 9-12. Patterson was highly skilled and still in his prime. But Holmes would wear him down with those left jabs, right crosses and an occasional uppercut.