HOLMES V NORTON - Great Fight.... BUT

Hang in there mate hahaha

 

That's all you've been going on about. I know this, I have the actual issue.


This is the kind of stuff that was baffling me. Your insistence of going on about Numbers 1 and 2 when i KNEW they were with Ring. I don't care. Look at the bit highlighted (your quote), what the hell does 'mandatory' have to do with a magazine?


"It's you who make the difference between mandatory and nr. 1. Going into 1976 Norton was nr. 1 (but not mandatory according to you) and Young was nr. 2."


Again, just so it sinks in for future reference (or you could be Bill and keep deny it for the next decade like the manchild you probably are):

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

:good

 

You just wasted a lot of nice colours, because I don't say that he was.

I just mentioned at one point that Norton and Young was rated nr. 1 and nr. 2 by The Ring going into 1976, but I never said that either of them was mandatory with the organizations. Obviously, this simple fact didn't go through.

You don't seem to catch on quickly, and persist going on about something I've clarified several times. Hopefully you understand now and can quit obsessing, but I wouldn't bet on it.

 

Well you did previously, until proven wrong.

You mentioned it a million times. I knew it all along, I didn't care. Yet, you kept mentioning it and you did say Norton was mandatory contender.

Stop telling lies then (see above)