"Holmes VS. Foreman" in 1999? What was suppose to be.?.?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by MRBILL, Oct 27, 2008.


  1. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008
    Foreman just marketed himself a whole lot better the second time around. Foreman found the fountain of Charisma; that's something that good Ol' Larry Holmes lacked... However, BOTH guys are / were great champions...... I just think Holmes had more skill, while Foreman had the power.....:rasta

    MR.BILL
     
  2. Charles White

    Charles White Chucker Full Member

    8,964
    2,220
    Sep 13, 2008
    Not a chance.
     
  3. Charles White

    Charles White Chucker Full Member

    8,964
    2,220
    Sep 13, 2008
    I agree that this fight in 1999 would be less entertaining (still entertaining though). I would much rather see this fight in the early 90's, such as 91 or 92.
     
  4. Bill1234

    Bill1234 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,314
    499
    Jan 28, 2007
    It would solve Larry's moaning about Foreman though. Most of his talk about Foreman involves him not fighting him. I do agree that in 1999 it wouldn't have been nearly as good as in 1992 or mid 1977.
     
  5. AnthonyJ74

    AnthonyJ74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,260
    53
    Feb 26, 2007
    Holmes has always been just a tad bit jealous of the comebacking Foreman's success and riches. The fight would have meant more to Holmes than to Foreman. Larry has ducked his fair share of fighters over the years - as has Foreman - but he always tries to make it sound like Foreman is a special case. Like Foreman not fighting Holmes was some big, giant sin!
     
  6. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008
    In a way it IS a sin....... "Holmes & Foreman" come from the same era... The fans were up for it in 1992, '93, '94 & 1995..... Hell, it was still viable in 1999, but not worth what George Foreman had originally thought.... Larry Holmes saw the light and was willing to cut his proposed 4 million dollar purse down to 2.5 million... Meanwhile, George Foreman was unreasonable, and unwilling to budge from his proposed 10 million dollar take.... G.F. did get a respectable 6 million dollar comeback offer, but George balked / backed-out all the way....:fire

    MR.BILL
     
  7. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,047
    Oct 25, 2006
    In '99 it would barely garner any interest I do agree there, but say late '93 or somewhere in '94?

    I think it would have been a big fight. Foreman was a media darling and had considerable drawing power at this point still, and Holmes' defiant stand against Holyfield wouls still be fresh in peoples' minds. (As would Foreman's, for that matter.)

    IN terms of legacy it would mean nothing, but funnily enough I think the public would have definitely been very interested in this fight before '95 or so.
     
  8. Bill1234

    Bill1234 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,314
    499
    Jan 28, 2007
    He does dwell on it too much, but it as was stated, in a way, it was a sin to boxing that the fight never took place. In 1992 (late 1992) the fight would have been massive. Both of them gave a prime Holyfield hell, and they were both the same age, and it was very marketable at the time.
     
  9. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008
    I'm nutty enough to accept them guys fighting each other here today in 2008. As long as both Larry & George train for three months in a serious manner and weigh between 245 to 260 pounds, I'll buy into it... None of this 60 year old and 285 to 300 pound crap like they look like right now....:tong

    MR.BILL
     
  10. Charles White

    Charles White Chucker Full Member

    8,964
    2,220
    Sep 13, 2008
    Yeah Im down with that. Can't speculate on Foreman's weight, but he keeps himself active and in fairly decent shape for his age. Holmes has said that if he were to fight Foreman today, he would come in at a reasonable 250 lbs. Much heavier that Holmes is used to, but for his age, not bad.
     
  11. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008
    '

    Holmes was 250 for "Bonecrusher" Smith in 1999 and 254 for Butterbean in 2002. Yes, Holmes was hefty, but still capable... Holmes was 236 for McCall in 1995.....

    George Foreman was 260 for Shannon Briggs in 1997...:deal

    MR.BILL
     
  12. Bill1234

    Bill1234 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,314
    499
    Jan 28, 2007
    Larry walks around now at around 275, so I don't think losing 20-25lbs would be big deal if he was given 3-5 months.
     
  13. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,590
    27,257
    Feb 15, 2006
    I look at it another way.

    With every year that went by from Foremans peak onward, the ballance of probability shifted further towards Holmes winning.
     
  14. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008
    I have no doubt that both Larry and George could lose the excess weight they're carrying in a 3 to 5 month training span... If they get serious, they could make the weights of 245 to 260 with ease... That ain't asking too much from them two old farts....:shock:

    MR.BILL
     
  15. Charles White

    Charles White Chucker Full Member

    8,964
    2,220
    Sep 13, 2008
    Holmes will always be capable.