Holmes vs Lewis, better competition?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by dmt, Aug 7, 2018.


  1. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,639
    80,900
    Aug 21, 2012
    :lol: Truth time, eh? OK.

    The fight was pretty close. Foreman probably edged it, if we have to be honest about it. Still, I rate even Old Foreman as a good fighter and Briggs' performance is worthy of note.
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,076
    Jun 2, 2006
    Lewis ,and is isn't close!
     
    BCS8 and JohnThomas1 like this.
  3. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,976
    19,012
    Oct 4, 2016
    I have to say Lewis
     
  4. Vince Voltage

    Vince Voltage Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,077
    1,301
    Jan 1, 2011
    Lewis all the way. Holmes beat Norton, took the belt home, refused to come out again to even mow the lawn. Once in awhile he'd go down to the local Elks club and knock out some guy on the curb outside.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,577
    27,222
    Feb 15, 2006
    Lewis unequivocally fought the better competition, but Mr Holmes would probably argue that he had the scars on his resume to show for it.
     
  6. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    Lewis and decisively imo.
     
  7. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,467
    Jan 10, 2007
    Let's see closely.

    Both have Mercer on their resumes so Mercer is eliminated.

    Holmes - old shot Ali. Lewis - shot Tyson. Ok, about even.

    Other than that, Holmes' best
    wins are:
    Norton
    Witherspoon
    Weaver
    Berbick
    Smith
    Cooney
    Shavers
    Snipes
    C Williams

    Lewis' best wins are:
    Holyfield
    Vitali
    Tua
    Golota
    Ruddock
    Tucker
    Bruno
    Rahman
    McCall
    Morrison

    You decide, but I think Lewis' list looks a bit more dangerous especially considering that some of listed Holmes' opponents lacked experience at the time of the fight.

    On this Lewis' list there are some past prime opponents, but no novices with 15 fights.
     
  8. rinsj

    rinsj Active Member Full Member

    777
    345
    May 19, 2007
    I disagree. Holyfield was past it. He could no longer throw those blistering combos with any consistency which allowed him to defeat much bigger men. Golota and McCall were unstable. Golota quit and got blasted out by lesser fighters than Lewis. Rahman was mediocre. His only good win was his k.o. over a under-trained Lewis.
    Ruddock was damaged goods after the 2 fights with Tyson. The 'Razor' accomplished nothing of note after that. Tucker was past it and never had that finisher instinct. He was too passive. He got blown away a few years after Lewis by smallish Herbie Hide. And prior to that suffered a t.k.o. from Bruce Seldon. Morrison was already afflicted by HIV illness and blasted out by Michael Bentt. Tua showed grossly overweight, taking away all hope of summoning anything remotely close to his Ike effort. Same when Lewis faced Lionel Butler who was grossly overweight and a recovering addict. If Butler had come into the fight in the shape he was in when he k.o'd Tony Tubbs in 1 he might have gotten to Lewis and produced the same result.

    I will say this though, Lewis k.o. over Rahman was awesome, especially being 36 years old and in fantastic shape. Also, I believe Lennox best win came when he was even older and out of shape... in his final fight against a young er, future dominate champ in Vitali.

    So, Holmes competition was better. They came into the ring fresh, in shape, stable mentally, many of them undefeated and produced their best efforts.
     
    robert ungurean likes this.
  9. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,250
    15,299
    Jun 9, 2007
    Agree
     
  10. GordonGarner65

    GordonGarner65 Active Member Full Member

    1,112
    883
    Nov 12, 2016
    It wasn't that Lennox fought the GREATEST resume ever, but he had one of the longest list of guys who were given a big chance PRE FIGHT.
    Everything here quite naturally is judged with hindsight eg, Grant didn't turn out great, but at the time pre fight he was seen as a huge threat etc, Lennox had a much bigger resume of '''live" fights , by that I mean fights where pre fight people were picking his opponent.
    Gary Mason was favourite to beat him.
    So was Ruddock. Bruno was given a decent chance as was Mercer .Tyson was only slight underdog with the bookmakers , as was Golota etc...
     
    BCS8 and janitor like this.
  11. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,467
    Jan 10, 2007
    I respect your opinion and you've made some good points.

    I don't rate highly Lewis' wins over Tyson (as he was completely shot) or McCall (who was just mental wreck in their 2nd fight), but other wins I've listed still were pretty good even with everything you mentioned. Maybe also replace Morrison with Mason.

    Still, I rank Holmes higher all-time than Lennox, as he went to reign for 7 years without a single loss, having defended his title 20 times.
     
  12. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,577
    27,222
    Feb 15, 2006
    You raise a valid point here.

    I would add that a lot of people picked Tua to beat him.
     
    GordonGarner65 likes this.
  13. GordonGarner65

    GordonGarner65 Active Member Full Member

    1,112
    883
    Nov 12, 2016
    Yes Tua also and Rahman in the return.
    Tucker was also a little underrated, he'd only lost to peak Tyson. I've always felt Lennox had the best resume of ' live' opponents as per my criteria above. People often forget pre fight perceptions. In Holmes case, the Ali fight is seen as a blowout yet the pre fight odds had Larry as only the slightest of favourites, same against Gerry C, most of Holmes other wins he was heavily expected to win, maybe with the exception of Norton.