Lemieux, Macklin, Rubio, Murray, Geale and Proksa. All top 10 middleweights. Weak? Maybe. Weak as ****? Not really.
I personally think Alvarez has a great chance due to styles, whether 155 or 160. As far as experience that am stuff doesn't matter, as a pro what actually counts GGG hasn't done sh!t. Head to head only real advantage GGG has is power, you don't need to be able to cut off the ring on Golovkin he's rigbt there. Canelo's speed, combinations, and defense could easily pull off a win. GGG is an entertaining fighter but overrated
Drenlou you're a terrible troll man. You gotta keep up appearances at all times. You sloppy as **** brah talking all sensible sometimes. It just won't do.
And if Canelo wins what do you do then? I'm a terrible troll..... get your head out your ass and learn boxing.... GGG ain't ****!!!! Bet the house on GGG, I dare you...
You mother****ers think GGG will run right through Canelo.... you dudes are the stupidest mother****ers I've ever seen.... Canelo will win and you lames will claim robbery..... That's how you chumps are.. .
I'm still waiting to see that fight where Canelo shows great footspeed and cutting off the ring :think
Golovkin has good foot movement but is a plodder also, ring generalship is debatable for either side, GGG has a decent output but he fighting sub tier fighters. How I see it Canelo has edge in combinations and counter punching, speed, defense, and experience GGG in foot movement, power, and accuracy. Golovkin being able to cut off the ring may not play a big part because Alvarez isn't gonna run and wants you to come to him. GGG is slow and hasn't fought a guy as good defensivly, in the mid and close range Alvarez's speed and defense would play a big part imo. Golovkin for the most part has shown to be a decent boxer with power, that's it looks like a world beater vs average guys but how that translate is another story.