Holyfield...Did he just have Tyson's number?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bummy Davis, Sep 19, 2009.


  1. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    Thats part of it, but more proof it wasnt the same Tyson of the late 80's. That Tyson was an excellent infighter. Could you see the 91 version of Holyfield manhandling Tyson? No way.
     
  2. Arka

    Arka New Member Full Member

    0
    7
    Sep 26, 2008

    Your argument you're giving just seems a bit simple-minded.


    I wish someone could technically break down their styles and give the possible strategies of what they consider to be the most effective versions of both fighters.:think
     
  3. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,049
    Oct 25, 2006
    Two things for me spring to mind:

    1) Rooney was gone.
    2) His fights had been easy up until Holyfield. I'm talking post-prison. He didn't have to face any kind of gut check in beating the likes of Seldon or Bruno, and then he had to face a major one in facing Holyfield.

    But having said that, Tyson was still very formidable. He looked hungry and in great shape. He still would have beaten the vast majority of heavyweights that night. Holy just wasn't one of them.
     
  4. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    271
    Jul 22, 2004
    The fact in Tyson was past prime, own fault or not that wasnt the best Tyson in there, and if he didnt actually **** Washington it wasnt his fault, however I'd side with the victim and say he probably forced her, Im not a nuthugging woman hater like many on here

    Go on give us your top 10 then because Dempsey, Liston, Marciano, Holmes, Louis fought worse competition and were less emphatic overall. Frazier and foreman were both only briefly at the top and had less depth to their resumes. And all have worse losses bar Marciano/Holmes and Rocky only fought at the top for a few years.
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    271
    Jul 22, 2004
    The fact is Tyson hadn't been past 3rounds in 5years, where as Holy had been doing that distance regular. Tyson had gone 4years with no boxing training, where as Holy had been doing the boxing training throughout that time. Tyson had lost his muscle and got fat in prison, holy improved his physique while Tyson was in prison

    Holyfield was vastly bolstered by some serious steroid use in 1996, just look at the physical improvements from Bowe 3 to Tyson 1
     
  6. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009
    So going to prison takes more out of your body than going to war in majority of fights you are in, Holyfield was also 34 at the time.

    Why dont you just concede commonsense, that Holyfield was no worse than Tyson physcially and i would argue Tyson was better off than Holyfield but defintely not less than Holyfield. You Tyson fans deffy logic because you dont want accept reallity.
     
  7. Arka

    Arka New Member Full Member

    0
    7
    Sep 26, 2008
    In this era of steroids and Human growth hormone,I have genuinely no idea, gooners.

    Seriously,I don't know.
     
  8. Primadonna Kool

    Primadonna Kool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,545
    7
    Dec 5, 2006
    Also...

    Evander Holyfield had better movement than a prime Mike Tyson, and more agility.....and endurance.

    Evander Holyfeild speed never get's talked about or enough credit..

    Evander Holyfield's hand speed, was immense....immense.

    In both Holyfield vs Tyson fights.....

    Not once did Mike Tyson hurt Evander Holyfield, not once did Mike Tyson back up Evander Holyfeild.

    Mike Tyson's power did not bother him.....

    This scared Mike Tyson, i am a massive Mike Tyson fan. But ive only really seen doubt and a hint of fear in Mike Tyson's eyes against Evander Holyfield.......

    In the rematch, Mike Tyson did not stare into Evander Holyfields eye's during the stare down...he kept on looking away.......

    In their first fight, Mike Tyson was trying to give Evander Holyfield some respect after the bell during the mid rounds, and i can distinctly...remember....

    Evander Holyfield just looked at him, and walked to his corner.

    Evander Holyfield had Mike Tyson's number, he would always beat him.............ALWAYS..!
     
  9. DDA365

    DDA365 Gatecrasher Full Member

    1,591
    1
    Nov 29, 2008
    Nobodies saying that, what are you talking about?

    You seem to be trying to dismiss suggestions that Tyson wasnt at his best when he fought Holyfield, which is pretty obvious to anybody that has eyes.
     
  10. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    271
    Jul 22, 2004
    Because the only reason Holyfield won was because he had better stamina down the stretch, meaning he had much better stamina, Tyson had much much better stamina in his prime, if Tyson had managed to maintain what he did in the first 5 rounds he would have won. Lets also not forget Holyfield had vastly improved his strength and condition through steroid use in this fight. If you cant see 4 years of zero training makes you a much worse fighter and past prime you really don't understand sport let alone boxing.

    SIMPLE, need to learn anything else about boxing just ask
     
  11. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009
    You are misinterpreting me, im saying its irrelevant bringing up how Mike was past his best because so was Holyfield, infact like i said you could argue more past it than Tyson.


    Holyfield has bigger cajones son not just better stamina, Holyfield has always had notoriously high stamina.

    Why would i need to ask you if i want to learn Boxing ? i know where your knowledge extends to ..............biasedness, refusing to accept reallity and bringing everything back to Mike in the 80"s when he woulda whooped Ali and Frazier on the same night.
     
  12. DDA365

    DDA365 Gatecrasher Full Member

    1,591
    1
    Nov 29, 2008
    Well physically maybe, but then I'm not actually too sure about that because despite being through all the wars and maybe being a bit slower Holyfield looked bulkier and stronger than he had preivously which for fighting Tyson is probably actually more useful, but youve got to look at boxing skills as well, holyfield proved he still had them...tyson proved his were almost gone

    You know most fighters will decline when they age and physically they start to weaken a bit, but with Tyson his decline was more in a boxing sense. His defense was so much worse, his combination punching was gone etc.
     
  13. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009
    Yeah ive heard this one before, Brother Mike got amnesia after Rooney left didn't he.

    The excuses are never ending.
     
  14. DDA365

    DDA365 Gatecrasher Full Member

    1,591
    1
    Nov 29, 2008
    Pardon? Its not an excuse, its his fault, what kind of excuse would that be? Its just stating a fact.

    You cant tell me that you dont think his skills declined.
     
  15. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    Yes inactivity is the death of any fighter. Boxing has to be second nature and the movements have to come naturally. Holy was active, and its not like he had to be too savvy against Tyson. I never thought Tyson ever looked like his old self. He made so many amatuer mistakes its almost like he was learning to box all over again, and his style had to be dialed in perfectly to work, because he was not boxing from the outside he was coming forward slipping and countering. The biggest thing that never returned was his timing, and thats a big part of the inactivity.