Holyfield-Tyson in 1991 or Mayweather-Pacquiao in 2010

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Thread Stealer, Sep 23, 2017.


Which would you rather have seen?

  1. Holyfield-Tyson in November 1991

    68.2%
  2. Mayweather-Pacquiao in May 2010

    31.8%
  1. Sting like a bean

    Sting like a bean Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,047
    1,594
    Apr 9, 2017
    Not a remotely tough call for me. Tyson vs Holyfield, and by a very, very, very wide margin, for the simple reason that I'm far more uncertain and far more curious about how that would have gone.
     
    SluggerBrawler likes this.
  2. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,694
    17,751
    Apr 3, 2012
    Tyson-Holyfield would've been a pretty even match in 1991 and a war.

    Mayweather-Pac would've been a repeat of 2015 with a few more punches thrown. Marquez already put the writing on the wall for Pac. Manny's hot streak did not include any elite counterpunchers, other than Marquez who made him look ordinary.
     
    Smoochie and SluggerBrawler like this.
  3. adokei

    adokei Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,864
    158
    Feb 28, 2016
    you do.
    you just had a shyt storm over how much better pedquiao would have fared in 2010
    in 2010 floyd demanded ped testing from pedquiao who refused...fear of needles and all.
    but if they had fought, peddie would have had ped testing and would have fared just as abysmally.
    thank you.
     
  4. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    A sh*t storm? Let me remind you what I said.

    Try again clown.
     
  5. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    That too, but I think that’s another dull decision win for RJJ.

    Even if they were the same size, I’m picking RJJ but a dull decision. But Hopkins going up 2 divisions makes it even harder for me to picture a Hopkins win.
     
    Smoochie and Greg Price99 like this.