Holyfield V Bruno?

Holy by late stoppage as Frank tired.

 

Bruno would have some success early on with his jab, but Holyfield would start to come on later and stop Bruno on his feet in the late rounds.

 

Bruno Tko 7

just fancy bruno to put in 1 huge round before he hits the championship rounds and starts to fatigue, n bruno was a hard puncher just never had that killer instinct but im gunna say bruno

 

Bruno would knock him out in 4 rounds. Holyfield was vastly overated.

 

Got to go with Holy, who was very crafty, had better stamina and technique. Bruno seemed to usually fail when a lot was on the line. He was good in many ways, but lacking in others. One of the most likable boxers and fun to watch though.

 

I could see Bruno starting out well, but Holyfield was simply too versatile, too tough, and too good.

 

As if anyone if going to pick Bruno.

 

Holyfield by TKO in 7.

 

Small heavyweights always are.

 

Holyfield by KO

 

on the contrary.

 

Bruno only ever lost to Lennox Lewis, Mike Tyson, Tim Withaspoon and Tim smith (a guy who Ko'ed him very early on in his career)

A lot of people seem to see him as a clown who just turned up and lost (a plucky loser), that really is'nt the case. I can't believe that so many people have been duped into thinking that David Haye beats him.