Holyfield vs Mayweather

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Pugilistic Punk, Jul 10, 2024.


Who's the better boxer p4p?

  1. Floyd Mayweather

    83.0%
  2. Evander Holyfield

    17.0%
  1. The one

    The one Member Full Member

    423
    509
    May 2, 2024
    Opinions are opinions.
     
  2. zadfrak

    zadfrak Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,404
    2,926
    Feb 17, 2008
    The other huge factor fighting elite competition is the wear and tear. Floyd never fought with those consequences.

    Imagine those hands alone deteriorating. Reflexes diminshed. And another thing those guys using their boxing radar to avoid getting hit===that leaves too. The punches they used to slip turns into getting hit clean.

    I sure never thought the Mayweather style was suited whatsoever for wear and tear. Especially if he is the 33 year old facing the undefeated 22 year old great prospect. Or having those diminished reflexes and having to finally take some fights were he is the guy going into the lions den.
     
    surfinghb likes this.
  3. Eddie Ezzard

    Eddie Ezzard Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,447
    5,130
    Jan 19, 2016
    What year? 1990?
     
  4. MarkusFlorez99

    MarkusFlorez99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,469
    14,485
    Jan 13, 2021
  5. Bornslippy

    Bornslippy Member banned Full Member

    141
    150
    Mar 29, 2025
    This is p4p. I was talking about who was the greatest. Smaller fighters are always advantaged in p4p comparisons. I don't know why you don't understand this. Holyfield is greater than Floyd without a doubt.
     
  6. OddR

    OddR Active Member Full Member

    1,137
    1,113
    Jan 8, 2025
    Mayweather would win a poll with any heavyweight but Ali and Louis. So not surprising.
     
  7. Barrf

    Barrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,383
    6,619
    Sep 19, 2021
    If we look at skills on display, it isn't close. But Mayweather never fought in an unlimited weight class, so Holyfield regularly got in there with much bigger men.

    As to records, man, it's hard to compare Holyfield to most fighters of his era or later because he fought everyone. Unlike others, he never protected his record, and his record reflects that. Anyone of note he missed wasn't his fault; he'd have happily have fought them had the opportunity arose. Mayweather with that attitude would have certainly picked up a loss or two, although he probably would have avenged them. I find Mayweather is a bit overrated by casuals but fairly underrated by the more hardcore. He was exceptional in his prime. ATG, HOF, top 10 P4P, you name it, he's in the discussion if we are being fair.

    So, man, I don't know.

    I will say that if a prime HW Holyfield were around today and Usyk wasn't, he'd be the Usyk of the era. And he'd be sure to go and fight Parker, Kabayel, Zhang, Bakole, and anyone else. I'd bet on him over all of them. Man a fight between him and Kabayl would be something. The ring could be tiny or huge, wouldn't change anything, they'd in the center of it the entire time.
     
    Last edited: Apr 25, 2025
    bolo specialist likes this.
  8. Barrf

    Barrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,383
    6,619
    Sep 19, 2021
    In terms of SKILLS? Absolutely not.
     
    themaster458 likes this.
  9. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,550
    4,290
    Jul 14, 2009
    Holyfield was a real fighter.Floyd was more like a businessman