Holyfield will always be better than Lewis and Wlad

The fact that you could describe the first Holy/Lewis fight as competitive says enough about your bias.

 

Holyfield lost twice.

What are Holyfields best wins at HW? Going 1 in 3 vs. Bowe? Winning against a fat, old Foreman? Winning vs. post-prison Tyson? Holyfields HW track record is noteworthy because hes a natural cruiser, not because the record is impeccable for a HW.

 

They were close? Alright, I don't think I can really talk boxing with you if you scored those fights close. Especially the first. Lederman was very generous to give Holy 3 rounds.

 

atsch Let me get this straight, you had Lewis winning by a closer margin in the first fight than the second? You are the only person on the planet besides the corrupt judges who actually scored the first fight to come away with that result.

First fight: 10-2 or 11-1
Second fight: 9-3 or maybe 8-4 if you're feeling generous to Holy

Not competitive fights.

 

Holyfield was always far better than Wlad, but I would rate Lewis higher.

 

You're completely delusional. Holyfields career is great but leaves much to be desired. Wins against shot fighters, many losses where he was outclassed by better men. Dragged out his career way too long losing fights he should never have fought.

 

Lewis should have 2 wins against Holyfield
And
Wladmir would have UD'd him.

Two better fighters.

 

I just searched your post history and for a guy who claims to be a Lewis fan you have literally never made a single positive post about him besides saying that you believe he had a good 1 - 2. Besides that every one of your posts regarding Lennox is negaive. It appears that you are not actually a Lewis fan but are pretending to be one to lend credibility to your arguments when you attempt to tear him down.