Holyfields take on Mayweather vs. Pacquiao

:thumbsup

 

Excellent post:thumbsup

 

Good observation and view on the fight.

 

I give Pac an excellent chance, even with Void's venue, his referee, his judges, him commentators, gloves, ring, etc., Void is a cheater.

 

LOL @ the idea of this being a one-sided fight for Pac. Too funny, Holy.

 

Here's Floyd's Olympic semi-final match for those who haven't seen it.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtZpB6r01Wg[/ame]

 

Void is void.

 

You'd have to be a reflexive naysayer, fanboy, or idiot, not to see the trouble with Mayweather and southpaws if you have followed his career. Or like some of us; followed his career, and then watched the whole thing from beginning to end on DVD, multiple times. Which fight was it, BTW, when Floyd Sr. complained that Floyd; "should never fight a southpaw again?"

 

Yeah, Floyd has so many problems with southpaws he has ZERO losses to them.

 

Punches from all angles, Holyfield has a point.

Void refused to fight Margarito, Pac, Cotto, Mosley, etc.

 

So, problem equals loss, in it's entirety, as a concept?

Are you THAT ****ing stupid? Seriously???

Having a "problem" means that you just lose, right? :roll: :roll: Automatically? That's clever. IDIOT.

 

Void is void.

 

Look, you pompous *******, you tried to make a lame-duck point and it went nowhere. If Floyd had "problems" with southpaws he wouldn't be facing them. If he had greater problems with southpaws he would've lost to one by now. You are grasping at straws. There is nothing for you to hold onto in this argument.

 

Void is "still" void.

 

Thats true, if he had THAT much trouble with southpaws he would just avoid them like he does top welter weights...