Honest Question: Who Rank higher: Crawford or Cotto?

I'd favor Spence over Cotto, & I wouldn't rule out that Crawford could beat May or Pac.

 

It’s close. Cottos huge MW title winner vs Sergio seems to get forgotten about as many thought Sergio would slice him up. I’d go TC

 

I'm going Crawford, but many sleep on Cotto who imo has the better resume overall

His earlier losses where to a guy likely using plaster and the great Manny pacquiao in one of the great performances this century. He lost to another all time great in Floyd, but made Floyd work hard and busted Floyd up, who wasn't as accurate as usual. It was no coincidence that Floyd wanted Sr involved again following the fight

Martinez looked shot, but no fault of Cotto. I'm not even sure I do have Crawford ahead. I guess the undisputed and being the man in a few divisions gives him the edge, but Cotto fought tougher opponents in his career.

I'm a cotto fan and think he goes under the radar. A very good boxer/puncher who would give the majority a hard fight

 

I disagree entirely. Spence might beat Cotto, Porter might be Cotto, Madrimov might be Cotto (although he beat Bud too imho), Postol might beat Cotto too, Gamboa also.

I'd favor Pacman to beat Bud in 2010 (or whichever year they fought but I dont count Bud out), Ive long held that the Bud that beat Spence beats any version of Floyd Mayweather, Bud would stop Margarito, and Bud would beat older Mosley too.

 

I also believe he would have a zero with the same opponents. I wouldn't pick spence over cotto, especially post car wreck

 

I don't see Porter beating Cotto, bjl12.

 

Cotto's resume poops all over Crawford's very thin body of work. Who would beat who (whom?) is a matter of conjecture but their records, up until now, speaks fir themselves.

 

This.

 

Crawford and it isn't close.

 

By those standards Cotto is also overrated.