So are you saying the poster I quoted is more knowledgeable and qualified than the official judge who scored the fight? Maybe he should sign up for the job to save boxing.
"pretending" Yeah I'm pretending when there's clearly evidence of a legit 2nd knockdown in round 7 but of course you will deny it because you're a Fury fan boy hence it's like talking to a brickwall.
The fight was last year and the result was a win to Fury. It will never change. Time to get over it. Living in denial is not healthy. Time to move on.
Idk why, I just really dislike Usyk's style of boxing. He's kinda meh for me as a HW champion. Yeah he's skilled sure but..idk
I'm disputing the 2nd knockdown that wasn't correctly called in the 7th round that "would've" made a difference to the official result. There's a difference between the two comments my guy.
Oh I see you're one of them wind up merchants mate I couldn't care less about Fury or the decision it was a total joke of a fight that almost ruined boxing's reputation thanks to Fury's clown show. Instead of trying to defend Fury and trying to make a positive about Fury getting up from a knockdown from an MMA fighter a total "LOL" moment from you. You should be utterly disgusted that a supposed World Heavyweight Champion made the sport we love look like an absolute joke with a pathetic performance against an non boxer who had never had a professional boxing fight in his life.
No I'm saying bad scorecards and corruption happen all the time in boxing. And when the vast majority are saying 7 rounds to Fury is an absolute joke then yeah I'm on the side of the vast majority. But you can keep pulling up the judges scorecards if you want I'm sure you think 118-110 scorecard in the 1st Canelo/Golovkin fight is legit because its "official" My god you sound like a politician with all these answers.
Bottom line is Fury lost to a fighter that is just simply better than him. Fury is getting knocked out in the rematch. Wait and see.
I presume you are also now a boxing referee. Strange that when it’s fury on the end of favourable officiating then it’s ok and the judges and referee know best etc but when it’s involving Parker then it’s the “referee being blind to illegal rough-housing and even awarding KDs for it”