Honest scoring of Fury v Usyk after rewatch

I presume you are also now a boxing referee.

Strange that when it’s fury on the end of favourable officiating then it’s ok and the judges and referee know best etc but when it’s involving Parker then it’s the “referee being blind to illegal rough-housing and even awarding KDs for it”

 

Pulling old posts as some sort of "gotcha" doesn't really work on me bud. Opinions change over time.

Some would also argue Usyk got favourable officiating against Dubios. End of the day it doesn't really matter. Usyk got the nod against Dubios, Fury successfully made the count and Parker unfortunately lost on points.

Do you have any points of your own to make?

 

Actually it does work it means you change your narrative.

What @hobby rider has proven is that when boxer you like doesn't get a fair shake you will complain about corruption and what not.

But yet when I called out a legit knockdown the referee missed in the Ngannou fight you simply put the blinders on and say "oh well it doesn't matter because Fury got the official decision" sounding like a politician as I said earlier.

So what does this all mean ? You change your narrative depending on whether it suits one of your favourite boxers.

And that's the difference between me, you, and like boss or whatever his name is. I'm not biased towards a fighter whether I like a certain boxer or not i'll call out BS just the same.

So much for me not being a "real" boxing fan like I was accused of earlier because I don't support the BS of Tyson Fury what a joke some of these posts are in this thread.

 

Just that you’re a hypocrite

 

Only those four.

 

I had it 114-114.
I Gave Fury I think round 11 or 12. Don't remember which one so our cards are very similar.

Ultimately, it was the 9th round that make people think Usyk copmletly destroyed Fury,becuase most of these guys don't get that boxing is scored per round

 

I will be honest, I am kind of disappointed that Usyk didn't even knock him down properly. Everyone talks about how he was robbed of a KO, but he hit him a lot, sure a lot of it wasn't clean but some of it was, and Usyk still didn't knock him down, and because of all of those punches and none of them properly knocking fury down, I can see why the ref didn't wave it off as Fury wasn't as out as it looked.

If you watch when Fury bounces off the ropes the first time, Usyk missed like 4 punches, so Fury wasn't as gone as people think.

 

For someone who isn't bias or doesn't care you're awfully fixated on a knockdown that doesn't exist. The referee made his call, move on.

It shows I'm capable of learning and putting old biases aside. It's a weird tactic you have of bringing up the past like everyone should have the exact same opinion forever. It's also quite lazy and shows you have no real opinion of your own.

 

Can you please take me through how Usyk won round 1, I'm just curious how Usyk fans score rounds

 

Please you know nothing about me and apparently nothing about boxing since you think that the scorecard was legit

 

The dude is a effing moron who is bitter that Parker got dominated by Joshua.

 

Prove me wrong then buddy.

 

Not bitter at all, it's boxing. Parker has never quit let alone against Andy Ruiz though, so there's that.

 

I already did, you sunk your own ship with your constant waffling depending if you like the fighter or not.

 

You haven't done anything of the sort. You just come across as an angry little man tbh. If you've nothing of value to add to the discussion we'll move on.