Honest scoring of Fury v Usyk after rewatch

No one is fixated my guy I'm just pointing out your inconsistencies in your opinions in which you change it to whichever suits your agenda on fighter you like or dislike.

Case in point the above post proves that you complained about Parker being hard done by and the referee. But yet when it comes to Fury benefitting from the referee not noticing a legit knockdown you deflect put the blinders on and come out with a total cop out reply like "well it's official decision"

Which shows you're biased and flip flop with your opinions aka being a hypocrite.

 

Changing your opinion over time is growth mate. It's only hypocritical if I still hold conflicting views which I don't. Complaining about the results won't change them, and I don't refer to revisionist history to support my arguments. Fury won whether or not you agree with it, the same way Parker has his losses.

The ref made his call, move on. The denial you have about your fixation is getting sad at this point.

 

That's total BS and you know it you got caught out with your inconsistencies and now you're deflecting/backtracking. Basically if a fighter you like benefits from a referee's decision or the decision itself you will happily accept it as shown in this thread. But yet when the shoe is on the other foot you complain about corruption and the referee being biased hence you flip flop with your opinions depending on your agenda.

Fury benefits from a decision = "Well it's the official decision and the referee's call"

Parker doesn't benefit from a decision = "Corruption biased referee"

You keep spouting this nonsense my guy the only time i've ever brought up about the 2nd knockdown is in this thread. Show me another topic where i'm constantly talking about the referee or a 2nd knockdown ? no one is "fixated or in "denial" i'm simply pointing out you're hypocrite which you are.

 

Interesting you only addressed half of my post and left the rest out...

You're clearly not getting the point and I don't have the time nor the crayons to explain it any clearer to you. Have a nice day.

 

Real fans enjoy the sport and they base their judgements and opinions on what actually takes place. Not try and pretend something happened that didn't in order to feed their hate narrative, like you do.

Haters gotta hate but it's a sad meaningless existence and you are welcome to it.

 

Oh clearly i have trust me you got exposed for being a hypocrite and then tried to deflect/backtrack to cover yourself. And then you accuse me of being fixated on something when infact i'm just pointing our your inconsistencies.

 

Just rewatched this fight again for the 4th time

incredible fighters these men. Special heavyweights.

Definitely both on the slide though and fading.

 

I guess everyone has their life savings and assets on Usyk to win?

Going by this thread there can be zero doubt, so you are all big fools with you don't round up/loan as much as you can and back usyk

It's free money

 

Post your betting slip from the first fight then given how 100% confident you were that fury would win.

 

He isn’t a hypocrite he’s just midway through his journey of growth and learning.
Kind of like a child.

 

No one in this thread has implied Fury doesn't have a chance so I'm not sure what you're on about TBH.

The issue was people trying to make out the 1st fight was a draw or even worse Fury won it which is total copium and nonsense Fury clearly lost in a competitive fight.

Does Fury have a chance in the rematch ? Of course he does but Usyk is a still a significant favourite I would say 65-35 in Usyk’s favour.

 

One day you'll actually start the learning process. Ignorance is bliss I guess.

 

Maybe not this thread but there are some on this forum who swear it's a forgone conclusion

I have it 60-40 usyk. I think even 70-30 or 80-20 is fair.

But to think Fury has zero chance is laughable.

 

I wasn't 100% certain
Did favour him. I do admit to trolling and saying he would 100% win, but as the fight grew closer I said it was close

Anyway, even if I was 100% (I wasn't) that Fury would win then, I'm not daft enough to watch rounds 4,5,6 and think Fury has absolutely no chance

One thing is saying Usyk is a huge favourite. I don't agree (though he is favourite) but that's 100% fine

There are a vocal few om here giving Fury zero chance, but I bet they would never risk any money

One poster in particular was absolutely bricking it during the Fury rounds on the mega thread

To cut a long story short, we can all chat rubbish and be full of arrogance, but let's see you guys back it up with your slips

 

The ref impeded Usyk several times at crucial points during his onslaught.

So you can see why the ref didn’t wave it off while accepting the ref’s intervention to rule a KD which prevented Usyk landing the coup de grace?

Fury was absolutely gone when the ref stepped in to make a ruling that he could’ve technically made earlier in the round.

The ref did his utmost to avert a default 10-8 round to Usyk by refusing to rule a KD or standing 8 - but then, with Fury about to be knocked into wonderland - the 10-8 became the lesser of two evils with the ref making it his priority to save Fury altogether.

The ref also improperly assisted Fury part way back to his corner - Tyson was ****ed as at that moment.