HONESTLY. What has Pacquiao really done to deserve a massive payday against Floyd?!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jacory Harris, Jan 9, 2010.


  1. zangetsu

    zangetsu Getsuga Tenshou Full Member

    812
    0
    Nov 18, 2006
    look up pac's resume and you'll see why.
     
  2. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Pacquiao is the greatest fighter in a long ass time. Since Whitaker and maybe even Leonard.

    Floyd aint on that level.
     
  3. hmi

    hmi Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,257
    0
    Sep 14, 2007
    There is something wrong with the OP if even a floyd boy won't agree with his pro-floyd thread.
     
  4. Doc

    Doc Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,915
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    Floyd is a great fighter I will not take that away from him. It is just he does not prove it like he did when he was young.

    Pac differs in the way that he proves it and overcomes adversity since the start of his career till now of course after he started beating all the Mexican warriors....

    Floyd just thinks about money now and care less about legacy....
     
  5. RafaelGonzal

    RafaelGonzal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,844
    13
    Mar 7, 2006
    you should be beaten with bats until you beg for mercy
     
  6. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    89
    Jul 19, 2004
    I laughed my ass off when I read the title of this thread.
     
  7. Ben_UK

    Ben_UK Member Full Member

    306
    0
    Dec 27, 2009
    He deserves it. Assuming he is not on drugs he has established himself as one of the most dangerous fighters in the sport.
     
  8. totsboy

    totsboy Active Member Full Member

    1,150
    0
    Aug 2, 2009

    coz debating a no brainer like you makes me a no brainer too :rofl
     
  9. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    So Hatton was never the same after fighting Floyd, but Malignaggi (who got completely schooled by the Hatton who had lost to Floyd) is a 'real fighter' and a viable opponent?

    You don't have to 'debate' trolls people, you just highlight the places in their own 'arguments' where they make themselves look like clowns....
     
  10. Dojo

    Dojo The Animal Full Member

    1,353
    2
    Aug 29, 2005
    Stupid ****ing post.:patsch
     
  11. SexualPanda

    SexualPanda Active Member Full Member

    1,190
    2
    Dec 7, 2008
    Ban this ****ing idiot. This guy is on Nallege's level or maybe worse.

    All that needs to be said is the proposed upcoming fights of both fighters:

    Pacquaio vs Clottey - toughest WW available at the moment, very high risk low reward
    Mayweather vs Matthew Hatton - A club fighter at best, and a guy who once lost to the great David Kirk with 75 losses (that's right, you read correctly):

    http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=9128&cat=boxer

    Geez hard to see whose the more deserving fighter of a payday and who the "real" coward is.

    ****ing wake up and smell what you're shoveling.
     
  12. Jetset78

    Jetset78 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,670
    0
    Jul 30, 2007
    Stopped reading here :dead
     
  13. cherokee

    cherokee boxfan Full Member

    834
    0
    Nov 20, 2009
    this is what I like about the *****s, they do make me laugh sometimes
     
  14. theHawtness

    theHawtness Active Member Full Member

    1,321
    0
    Apr 2, 2007
    no one deserves a fight against floyd. someone needs to build a time machine and fetch SRR. he's the only person worthy of sharing a ring with the great floyd mayweather.
     
  15. ybfake

    ybfake Active Member Full Member

    560
    0
    Jul 30, 2009
    I have to agree Pac's best wins are suspect. If he was truly great then why would he leave us who dont believe with doubts. For example why not just fight Cotto at 147 his best weight when you fought Hoya at 147; why not just take the random blood test with the 14 day cutoff. Even though IMO his wins are a product of good match making they cant be totaly dismissed because in all fairness there were risks involved with his best wins no matter how minimal they were.