Honeyghan vs Curry or Stracey vs Napoles?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by emallini, Sep 27, 2019.

  1. emallini

    emallini Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,280
    2,506
    Mar 16, 2008
    What was the bigger upset?
     
  2. Richard M Murrieta

    Richard M Murrieta Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,262
    10,900
    Jul 16, 2019
    The bigger upset I believe was the Donald Curry vs Lloyd Honeyghan World Title bout in 1986. Donald was on a roll, a complete fighter, especially his victories over Milton McCrory and Marlon Starling. He was talked about being a challenger to World Middleweight Champion Marvelous Marvin Hagler in early 1987, bypassing Mike McCallum, also a World Champion at 154 lbs. With the Honeyghan loss, it opened the door to Hagler vs Leonard on April 6 1987, won by Sugar Ray Leonard, by decision. Jose Napoles losing his World Welterweight Title to John H. Stracey, of England, was to be expected on Dec 6 1975, because of Napoles poor showings against Armando Muniz, during the year. He began to slide after his unsuccessful bid to win the World Middleweight Championship from Carlos Monzon, on Feb 9 1974, in Paris, France. Monzon by a TKO7, Jose could not answer the bell.
     
    Tippy, emallini and Ragamuffin like this.
  3. red cobra

    red cobra Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    38,059
    7,264
    Jul 28, 2004
    The big upset was Honeyghan-Curry...NOT Stracey-Napoles. Mantequilla was shot....as evidenced by his two gruelling battles with Armando Muniz. The Napoles that Stracey defeated was a charred crisp of a husk of the fighter he once was. IMO, Napoles' last hurrah was that 9th round tko of Hedgemon Lewis in Aug. of -74....and just for the record, the great Cuban master would have had both Muniz and Stracey for lunch and dinner just a few years earlier.
     
    roughdiamond and Ragamuffin like this.
  4. Richard M Murrieta

    Richard M Murrieta Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,262
    10,900
    Jul 16, 2019
    I totally agree, like you said a few years before the Stracey bout, Napoles would have destroyed both Muniz and Stracey
     
  5. Noel857

    Noel857 I Am Duran Full Member

    1,444
    1,513
    Mar 24, 2019
    Definitely Honeyghan v Currie .Lloyd shook up the world pinched that one from the greatest
     
    Ragamuffin likes this.
  6. Tonto62

    Tonto62 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,054
    2,799
    Mar 26, 2011
    Honeyghan v Curry imo,we knew Napoles was near the end,,Curry getting beaten up was a shock.
     
    Ragamuffin likes this.
  7. Cecil

    Cecil Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,353
    3,733
    Mar 22, 2015
    Napoles was a shell of what he had been, to be fair Stracey recognised this post fight.
     
  8. Rope-a-Dope

    Rope-a-Dope Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,671
    5,461
    Jan 20, 2015
    Honeyghan vs. Curry was bigger.

    Backus vs. Napoles was a bigger upset by far than either of these.
     
    red cobra likes this.
  9. emallini

    emallini Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,280
    2,506
    Mar 16, 2008
    Thanks guys
     
    red cobra likes this.
  10. red cobra

    red cobra Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    38,059
    7,264
    Jul 28, 2004
    Look up "Fluke" in the dictionary, and you'll see a pic of Napoles-Backus next to it.
     
  11. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    38,904
    18,284
    Apr 27, 2005
    There actually isn't much between these two "major upsets", and they were both very much major upsets.

    Curry was around a 5-1 favorite and despite Napoles being past his best he was a major favorite and fighting at home. The odds would have been very similar between the two bouts. Basically nobody expected Stracey to win and Napoles was still on his winning ways having basically shut out Muniz the fight prior. Even on the way down Napoles was still a very tough ask.

    I'd shade it for Curry - Honeyghan but certainly not by much.
     
    Unforgiven likes this.
  12. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,954
    5,067
    Dec 10, 2014
    I think they were both huge upsets but Napoles was getting long in the tooth and had showed slippage whereas Curry was in his prime. So, I would say the Honeyghan upset of Curry was the more surprising, bigger upset.
     
    roughdiamond likes this.
  13. The Funny Man 7

    The Funny Man 7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,823
    1,864
    Apr 1, 2005
    As others have said, Curry was at the top of his game while Napoles was aging and he was turning into a bit of a diva. It was leaking out to the public that Napoles was drinking too much. He'd never been the hardest worker but by that point he was really slacking in the gym.

    That was still a brilliant win for Stracey, especially since he got off the deck to score the finish.
     
  14. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,280
    1,745
    Oct 22, 2006
    With hindsight it was clearly Honeyghan/Curry; but you would have got long odds on that with John H on the deck in the first round in Mexico City...