Hopins Robbed - 9-3 Hopkins

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PowerPuncher, Apr 20, 2008.


  1. Toopretty

    Toopretty Custom made Full Member

    22,883
    1
    Jul 3, 2007
    Calzaghe won by the dumb ass announcers giving him credit for slaps/punches that missed by a mile. He did take over down the stretch where Bhop could of won..Beebs scorecard is utter **** as Bhop clearly won round 10 even though he took a 1:30 minute break for Calzaghe playing with his balls. This was a close fight and Calzaghe was losing rounds the whole beginning of the fight and not landing anything. Bhop out skilled him and made Calzaghe just look like a raw guy with stamina and a good chin and speed. His boxing skills AINT **** compared to fighters like Bhop and JT.
     
  2. death

    death Active Member Full Member

    758
    0
    Apr 11, 2008
    Whoever thought Calzaghe won clearly does not appreciate or even understand about boxing on the inside. I cannot believe what I am hearing. Hopkins murdered him on the inside. Hopkins style on the inside was so good, so sneaky, that the judges did'nt even call those punches. They are a bunch of blind old bats.

    Hopkins landed cleaner harder punches, he landed MORE punches on the inside than were called. Joe plays patty cake for 3 seconds on Hopkins gloves= Kooky Calzaghe fanboy hysteria.:nut :nut :nut :nut :nut
     
  3. D_knowsboxing

    D_knowsboxing The King is back Full Member

    1,971
    1
    Feb 4, 2008
    Church!:deal
     
  4. kungfu

    kungfu Member Full Member

    247
    0
    Dec 9, 2007
    Mate, scorecards are supposed to be an ubiased review of the fight even when your man lost, thats just a nuthugger card plain and simple!
     
  5. cjk44

    cjk44 Member Full Member

    249
    4
    Mar 6, 2006
    How did HBO score it?
     
  6. DamonD

    DamonD Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,285
    39
    Nov 19, 2004
    9-3?!

    Since I had it 114-113 Calzaghe, I can understand the complaints from the Hopkins fans but giving Calzaghe only 3 rounds seems utterly bizarre.
     
  7. BigBarry

    BigBarry Grumpy Old Man Full Member

    496
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Kellerman had it 116-111 in favor of Joe
     
  8. badman

    badman Member Full Member

    244
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    I saw this film once "One flew over the cuckoo's nest"

    Enough Said
     
  9. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Yeah cuz Taylor's boxing skills came in real handy vs. Pavlik, twice no less. :rofl
     
  10. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    I think Lederman's card was 115-112 for Joe.
     
  11. Samurai

    Samurai I lost an avatar bet Full Member

    3,634
    4
    Mar 30, 2008
    Jesus that is one ****ing pathetic score card. Holy ****.
     
  12. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Um, because Hopkins only hit Calzagne like that twice or 3 times per round maybe? Maybe because judges don't score points for acting or holding?
     
  13. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    You are full of ****. All Hops did on the inside was hold & hit, mostly with rabbit punches....................try watching the fight sober. :thumbsup
     
  14. nervousxtian

    nervousxtian Trolljegeren Full Member

    14,049
    1,098
    Aug 6, 2005
    You know who really won this fight by the way the corners were talking down the stretch.

    Enzo was worried, Freddie was not.

    Joe didn't do a damn thing by be active, but it was effective. Nard got the better on the inside.

    Joe tried to pull a SRL and flurry the last 10seconds and steal rounds.. looks like it worked... sad really.
     
  15. mattress

    mattress Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,030
    2
    Apr 8, 2007
    It definitely makes a difference. When drunk, I thought the fight was very close.