What about the 32-0 Glenn Johnson? The underrated Keith Holmes to unify? Prime Echols, when he was a beast? John David Jackson, Eastman, Wright, Tito?
Don't let that Calzaghe fight get into your mind so much mate. Sure you disagree with those that argue B-Hop won that fight, but this doesn't mean ol' Bernard doesn't have quality wins in his resume.
John David Jackson - not even going to respond to that.Johnson was strong but not great technically. Eastman - good fighter but lazy.Llold Honeyghan correctly said of him that he had the ability to beat Hopkins but no the know how. Wright and Trinidad - both naturally smaller men,same with ODLH. So when you strip that all away really only the Tarver win could be considered impressive.
i do see his point here, he's obviously responding to the seemingly never ending **** calzaghe gets on here for his opponents. but 2 wrongs dont make a right ,and hopkins has obviously been a fine champion ( as has joe calzaghe ).
His title reign was not littered with legends. Funny thing is people on here rag the WBO but where were the IBF/WBC/WBA digging up some of these non entities to fight Hopkins??
What about Holmes?, 2 time champ. Only lost a close decision in other bloke backyard, came back to stop him to regain the title..