Hopkins and Mosley shouldn't be in P4P top 10

Do these bow-tied pundits know anything? I'm missing Bunce, he genuinely and visibly gets excited about the big fights!

this was terrible:

"Bernard Hopkins and Shane Mosley shouldn't be in there, they're past it now. "Maybe Pavlik should be a bit lower as he has a couple of losses"

 

I lost all respect for the Sky boxing pundits after the ridiculous comments they came out with during and after Khan beat Barrera - obviously just trying to big Khan up because he has a contract with Sky Box Office.

The cringeworthy interview with Barrera post fight summed it up where the interviewer barely asked him if the cut had played a part and just kept pushing for Barrera to say that Khan was World Class.

Total clowns. Nelson especially, talks rubbish 99.9% of the time.

Bunce is a far better Boxing pundit - entertaining and actually know's what he's talking about.

 

all i know is i had hopkins winning both fights against taylor, rematch could be a draw if your generous to taylor, but that still means hopkins wasnt beaten. i had cal clearly but closely beating hop, so yes hop is def one of the top p4p fighters, Mosely is a lil bit harder to place but hes also in a more competetive division arguably and none of his losses since forrest have been really decisive, so yeah Id place him near the top.

 

Hopkins is the really great one there. Mosley is HOF.