Hopkins at 37/ GGG at 36

Golovkin never lost to Canelo. The version that Golovkin beat was bigger, better, benefiting from PED’s and more experienced than the Canelo Mayweather beat. Golovkin at 36 beat the best Canelo twice, but got screwed over.

Middleweight Canelo> Green, weight drained Canelo that Mayweather beat.

 

man he got a few shots, but naa BCS is kinda wrong to tihnk he had ATG skills like Bern

 

I'm not even so sure about that. PBF still holds the advantage in reach and as slow and as easy to hit as GGG is PBF would have a field day with his ass. He would be by far the slowest fighter PBF would ever fought and PBF would come in light around 152 for the fight and embarrass him. The difference in speed reflexes and skill is that great. GGG would look like he was fighting underwater against the version of PBF who beat Canelo. He had trouble landing on Canelo clean he would air condition the whole arena against PBF with those misses.

 

Floyd Mayweather was giving up weight and size. You can cry all you want but its not going to erase the record books. Golovkin has never beaten elite fighter. I don't care how many kids his old ass was fighting in the amateurs, till this moment the best name on his record is Kell Brook. That's sad for a supposed all time great middleweight.

P.S. the record books cares not about your feeling.

 

And I guess Hopkins never lost to Taylor to right? Log off.

 

The record books have descriptions, and that will be that Golovkin got robbed twice against The best version of Canelo.

 

This is nothing but excuses after the fact when will people like you realize that your God simply wasn't as good as you made him out to be. Before the 1st fight all we heard was GGG was going to destroy Canelo and when that didn't happen the excuses rolled in the rematch happens and we get more excuses. If PBF fought the same Canelo he fought back in 2013 that GGG fought he would still beat him Why? Because PBF is a bad match up for Canelo and beats any version of him and PBF is a better boxer than Canelo and GGG period. You can't outbox the outboxer similar to JMM who PBF beats any version of him to.

 

Not the type of description that you're thinking about....but nice try.

 

Its easy to dismantle anyones resume, but fact remains every win that is questionable and controversial has an asterisk in the history books with a description. You hate Golovkin, its okay, nice try though. The two Robberies will not be forgotten.

 

You're right it is and GGG's is trash his best win is Danny Jacobs who lost to Pirog years ago and Jacob's best win is Quillen.

 

Mayweathers best win is a washed up past prime pac who lost to Horn.

See, its easy

 

thats an atrocious post - theres a dozen guys better than the manny who lost to horn. ATGS HOF elite on Moneys CV.

Why are you trying to make 3G look so bad with a trash post? What you SHOULD have said is that actually titleholder Lemmy was a better win.

 

Hopkins hasn't taken a drug test in 10+ years.
He's handed out more NDA's than Trump.

 

Overall resume Yes, at 160 I don't think so.