Hopkins-Calzaghe in a different perspective.......

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by box3r86, Aug 11, 2008.


Page 2 of 7
  1. Loewe

    Loewe internet hero Full Member

    5,479
    12
    Jul 15, 2008
    You wanna tell us that our oppinions are not counting? Who are you to say that, ******?
     
    Loewe, Aug 12, 2008
    Loewe, Aug 12, 2008
    #16
  2. box3r86

    box3r86 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,506
    1
    Feb 8, 2008
    like what facts? he was the linear champ. at the time he had the wbo, formerly ibf and the ring gave him the belt too. kessler forced the fight and challenged. even kessler said at the time joe was the best in the division and wanted to take him on.
     
    box3r86, Aug 12, 2008
    box3r86, Aug 12, 2008
    #17
  3. Minto

    Minto The Beast Full Member

    784
    0
    Jun 30, 2008
    Hast du es auch noch im Ohr: Svennie, du must jetzt wegrennen; Svennie tu doch nur so als ob du schlägst! ?
     
    Minto, Aug 12, 2008
    Minto, Aug 12, 2008
    #18
  4. box3r86

    box3r86 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,506
    1
    Feb 8, 2008


    plus the ring magazine gave calzaghe the belt after his 18th world championship victory and 2nd world title. are you telling me that you are more knowledgeable than the ring, even before all the oscar and golden boy ****!?

    i think not!
     
    box3r86, Aug 12, 2008
    box3r86, Aug 12, 2008
    #19
  5. Minto

    Minto The Beast Full Member

    784
    0
    Jun 30, 2008
    f.... off

    The ring belt does not mean a sh..t sometimes. Roy Jones also got the ring belt in 2000, although Michalszewski was the real linear champ!
     
    Minto, Aug 12, 2008
    Minto, Aug 12, 2008
    #20
  6. Loewe

    Loewe internet hero Full Member

    5,479
    12
    Jul 15, 2008
    Nope he wasn´t. To become the linear champ you hate to unify 3 belts or beat the number two of the division. that only happened when he beat Kessler.

    Beside that Calzaghe wasn´t the man when he had only the WBO belt. Ottke had the IBF belt and even unified with the WBA belt. But Hopkins was the man when he had only the IBF belt because he cleaned out the division. Huge difference. Ang Hopkins biggest defence wasn´t Taylor but Trinidad.
    Hopkins reign was more dominant and he beat better opposition during it. Just like Hopkins is the superior fighter to Joe is resume and achievements are also superior.
     
    Loewe, Aug 12, 2008
    Loewe, Aug 12, 2008
    #21
  7. Loewe

    Loewe internet hero Full Member

    5,479
    12
    Jul 15, 2008
    Yop, naja war ziemlich Scheiße aber aus deren sicht wohl richtig. Leider.
     
    Loewe, Aug 12, 2008
    Loewe, Aug 12, 2008
    #22
  8. Minto

    Minto The Beast Full Member

    784
    0
    Jun 30, 2008
    :good
     
    Minto, Aug 12, 2008
    Minto, Aug 12, 2008
    #23
  9. Jack Presscot

    Jack Presscot Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,489
    1
    Sep 23, 2005
    Actually I agree with him. Why dont you go back to the bar, and buy some German ****, I mean beer, and look at some ugly Frauleins, I work with a German woman and I have to be careful not to look at her in the face so I wont turn into stone.
     
    Jack Presscot, Aug 12, 2008
    Jack Presscot, Aug 12, 2008
    #24
  10. Minto

    Minto The Beast Full Member

    784
    0
    Jun 30, 2008

    Very good argument!:roll: Thats stupid!
     
    Minto, Aug 12, 2008
    Minto, Aug 12, 2008
    #25
  11. Loewe

    Loewe internet hero Full Member

    5,479
    12
    Jul 15, 2008
    2 world wars in which the US had to save your sorry ass and one world cup? Well, we have three and three Euro-Cups. Idiot.

    Really poor of you to write bs like that.
     
    Loewe, Aug 12, 2008
    Loewe, Aug 12, 2008
    #26
  12. box3r86

    box3r86 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,506
    1
    Feb 8, 2008
    ok thats just as irrelivent as im comparing the two fights between calzaghe and kessler and taylor. read all the post. dont get so caught up with the whole linear. he was still the best super middle at the time and read the rest of what i say! just dont get caught up. im sayin that 20 defences in and they faced younger undefeated guys. the difference was joe beat his and hopkins struggled. plus theres no doubt in my mind that kessler is better than taylor.
     
    box3r86, Aug 12, 2008
    box3r86, Aug 12, 2008
    #27
  13. box3r86

    box3r86 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,506
    1
    Feb 8, 2008
    lol, you took the bait!!!

    plus i deleted it off my original comment.
     
    box3r86, Aug 12, 2008
    box3r86, Aug 12, 2008
    #28
  14. pugilist64

    pugilist64 Guest

    You came in to both world wars late and the Soviet Union was the main reason for the defeat of Germany. Study history and stop watching the John Wayne movies.
     
    pugilist64, Aug 12, 2008
    pugilist64, Aug 12, 2008
    #29
  15. Minto

    Minto The Beast Full Member

    784
    0
    Jun 30, 2008

    We are talking about Calzaghe - Hopkins, not about the 2nd world war. :huh
     
    Minto, Aug 12, 2008
    Minto, Aug 12, 2008
    #30
Page 2 of 7