Hopkins dissects Golovkin's style & says he would of disarmed GGG

Hopkins....." I'll never let a white boy beat me." Oh, sure.

 

And you are as proven as your predictions

 

:deal

 

Pavlik was undefeated, the lineal MW champion, and his resume at that time takes a HUGE dump on Bumlovkin's...

 

Lol.

Trinidad's wins at 160 are better than Bumlovkin's...

 

What did Golovkin do to you Cisco?

I think it is a breath of fresh air that he is a nice classy guy that lets his fists do the talking.

And people like it.

 

:huh

I guess you've never heard of guys named Jones, Toney or Nunn.

 

Ok, how does that negate the FACT that the Triple Duck isn't even the biggest draw in his own division?

 

When is he going to fight someone with a pulse? His whole career has been one tune up after another - and that wont change come this Saturday night...

 

I am familiar with them, I said I would pick Hopkins with confidence. That doesn't mean I would never pick another fighter over Golovkin.

I think Roy Jones could beat him as well.. But that would all come down to hoping that Roy's speed and power would hurt Golovkin and make him hesitant. If Golovkin could walk Roy down and take his shots, I see a KO win for GGG.

I could also see James Toney giving him trouble, but I would be hesitant about picking Toney.

Nunn I think would be doing quite well, but I would pick him to get stopped late.

Bernard though I think has the perfect style to beat GGG.

 

Roy, Toney and Nunn would all be huge favorites to beat Bumlovkin. Both Roy and James KO the Triple Duck EASY. Jones was just way too fast and hit too hard @ 160. Toney was just WAY to crafty for a guy as easy to hit as Bumlovkin is...

 

Toney at his best I would probably pick over Golovkin, but my problem there is I don't know which Toney would be showing up.. He was a bit inconsistent.

 

I actually think Hopkins & Toney (prime) are the two worst styles for GGG so I agree

 

pre age 40 Bernard would beat him, theres no doubt.3g would have a punchers chance.


the one that taylor beat when Bernie was turning 40 on the ebb not sure don't think so, and any Hopkins after that no longer has the tank to guarantee a victory.

 

What does it even mean ? Floyd was the biggest draw in his division ? so Pac cant be a star ? (some would say it was the other way around... but nm) , you can be a BIG star and still not be the biggest draw in your division.... i dont even know what your point witht that line but its probably dumb....