Hopkins dissects Golovkin's style & says he would of disarmed GGG

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mellamomarcos, Oct 14, 2015.


  1. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,283
    15,102
    Dec 6, 2008
    Hopkins was 60 years old. Kova is pretty orthodox but GGG is just the definition of robotic and straight up. I have nothing against him, he's a good fighter, just don't like his style too much, 0 dynamism.
     
  2. TheDarkLord

    TheDarkLord Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,854
    15
    May 24, 2011
    Hopkins is absolutely an all time great. He could quite likely of beat GGG would have been a good fight.
     
  3. Palooka

    Palooka Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,343
    42
    Feb 1, 2015
    Hey, you're admitting Cotto (and Canelo?) fight in Golovkin's division! Stick to the script!
     
  4. kk17

    kk17 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,170
    906
    Jun 23, 2007
    You talking about Golovkin ? :patsch
     
  5. Cisco Route

    Cisco Route He Who Says Nay banned

    7,156
    5
    Apr 14, 2014
    Not at 160. Toney @ MW was always in shape and at his best. James takes Bumlovkin to school then turns his lights out...
     
  6. Cisco Route

    Cisco Route He Who Says Nay banned

    7,156
    5
    Apr 14, 2014
    Yes.

    Bumlovkin is a BASIC fighter who just happens to hit really hard. He's not a Julian Jackson type puncher but he does have good power...
     
  7. Cisco Route

    Cisco Route He Who Says Nay banned

    7,156
    5
    Apr 14, 2014
    ...who all beat the brakes off of the Triple Duck...
     
  8. runner_phob

    runner_phob Active Member Full Member

    880
    3
    Oct 13, 2015
    In your sick dreams.
     
  9. Cisco Route

    Cisco Route He Who Says Nay banned

    7,156
    5
    Apr 14, 2014
    The Triple Duck hasn't even sold PPV #1 yet and already you Bumlovkin nut gulpers have declared him a "BIG star".


    LOL...


    Here are the FACTS:

    Bumlovkin hasn't sold a SINGLE PPV yet - so labeling him a "BIG star" is at best premature.

    Bumlovkin is NOT the "A side" for any big fight he could find himself in so, again, labeling him a "BIG star" is at best premature.

    Bumlovkin isn't known to the casual fans and doesn't even draw more viewers than Deontay Wilder - so, again, labeling him a "BIG star" is at best premature.
     
  10. runner_phob

    runner_phob Active Member Full Member

    880
    3
    Oct 13, 2015
    GGG is the definition of "I will take your head off". If you like runners and huggers, it is your right. He can do everything they can, just prefers to fight and not dance. It works at 160. He would likely fight differently against big and strong opponents.
     
  11. Cisco Route

    Cisco Route He Who Says Nay banned

    7,156
    5
    Apr 14, 2014
    Jones, Toney and Nunn ALL have better resumes, Genius. :hi:
     
  12. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Why not fight him then Bernard?
     
  13. Palooka

    Palooka Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,343
    42
    Feb 1, 2015
    You sound like such a petty jackass writing all this.

    Also, your comparison to Wilder's ratings is hilarious given you're comparing GGG's ratings on PAID TV (HBO) to Wilder's ratings on FREE TV. I mean, you are either being completely intellectually dishonest or you are really stupid.

    Either way :rofl
     
  14. BASHar Asad

    BASHar Asad Active Member Full Member

    698
    1
    Aug 31, 2015
    Quoted for stupidity.
     
  15. kk17

    kk17 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,170
    906
    Jun 23, 2007
    Golovkin has great power but it's his balance, footwork, timing and punching varity what makes him special his chin is also very good

    Lemieux, Jacobs and Curtis Stevens are basic fighters who just hit really hard