Bernard Hopkins has a case for claiming the n.1 p4p spot. He has the best resume among active fighters, and is still world champ in his division. With the exception of Ornelas, BHop has been fighting all top-level opposition for years. With 20 consecutive title defenses at MW, and the fact that no one has yet succeeded in dethroning him at LHW, how can we deny him the top p4p crown? How is Pacquiao's resume better, especially if you consider that he has lost to Marquez 3 times in many people's eyes? Who agrees?
Hes not in the top ten. Dawson who would beat him at anytime just gave some of his own medicine in their fight, and Hopkins would not touch him now. Dawson, Bute, Ward, Cloud would all farily easy beat him at his own weight. P4p, don't be ridiculous.
after seeing his last performance, I wouldn't even put him ahead of pac even if pac loss the decision. He is top 5 though ahead of martinez definitely
No MRI no p4p top 10... Number 1? Hahaha that's some funny ****! The ***** quit in his last match. No mas style.
What Hopkins thinks: http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/image...440/041/129327468_crop_650x440.jpg?1318883395
for my boy hopkins to be p4p 1. he would need to beat chad and 2 of the best fighters at 168. make them move up of course, ill give hopkins p4p 5 or 6.