So you dont know that style matters? You are saying this now, and when Kessler KO's Froch, you can't change your mind... Cuz it wont be different... Either Froch or Kessler is the easyer fight "style based" Kessler is the better combination, preassure, jabbing boxer. Froch is the more willpowered boxer. No matter who is the better Froch vs Kessler.... And... The bigger draw in england vs denmark ? I really think the bigger draw is in denmark. I know the whole calzaghe story, but like Froch is saying, Kessler is like becham in denmark..
Its okay, I wont argue with you because I feel sorry for you.. I hope you find peace 1 day in real life, and fix the thing that made you a internet troll. Good luck.
I love Kessler, but he has a serious lack of inside fighting ability and his stamina isn't as good as Froch's. I think Bernard matches up pretty well against him, certainly the Bernard even of '08 beats any version of Mikkel IMO. Not sure if he has enough left now to beat eiher Froch or Kessler though, they're two completely different propositions to a crude and limited fighter like Cloud.
Kessler is more of an AB & C fighter with a full repetoire - harder for Hopkins I would say. Froch is tough as nails but nobody is tougher than Hopkins.
You seem to forget that "Kessler's opposition" includes Froch whom he beat quite handidly, which was quite an impressive win given that Kessler isn't the fighter he was before shoulder and hand injuries took away his elite-level combination punching.
His fight with Froch was super close and he could have easily lost that decision . Its def not a win Kessler should boast about . Im not a fan of either fighter and probably never will be . But Those scorecards of 116/112 117/111 was absurd .