Hopkins is a Justified Cry Babyget off pascal's back. he called hopkins a cry baby

get off Pascal's back. he called Hopkins a cry baby and Hopkins does argue about all of the recent decisions that didn't go his way and he should. Hopkins hasn't really lost a fight since 1993 and he didn't lose to pascal. that said, Hopkins '3 losses against Taylor and Calzaghe were fights in which neither taylor or calzaghe were effective or could land anything meaningful at all! they both got schooled and exposed as frauds and walked away victorious because of an excuse like "work rate." that's what indecisive idiots who don't understand the sweet science use to score fights. but pascal actually floors Hopkins twice, lands clean punches, and counters some of Hopkins hits. he brought out the beast in Hopkins that Hopkins never had to bring out in his recent fights because no one else has even made Hopkins feel threatened enough to let out. did Hopkins school Pascal, yup. but he schooled calzaghe and taylor worse, and lost. think about it. he neutralized them without even having to throw punches. Pascal at least made him have to fight. how can you be mad at him and call this robbery, but not call the taylor and calzaghe fights robbery when neither one of them did **** but get schooled? and hopkins is my favorite fighter, but a draw isn't a bad call for that fight.

 

lol! i was thinking that when i was typing it. long drawn out paragraphs and run-on sentences are a turn off to me too. i'll remember it next time. thanks